2014
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2014/3244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Fetal Weight and Its Correlation With Actual Birth Weight by Sonographic Measurement of Fetal Abdominal Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness (Fastt)

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:To study the correlation between fetal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (FASTT) and actual birth weight. METHODS: Fifty women with normal singleton pregnancy underwent sonography at 37-39weeks of gestation. Subcutaneous fat measurement of fetal abdomen was done at the about 2cm from the site of entry of umbilical vein into the fetal abdomen. It was then correlated with the actual fetal weight. RESULTS: Birth weight was divided into three groups for analytic purposes. Group I-weight less than 10t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singh et al [15] agreed to our results; the birth weight was divided according to the percentile in three groups according to which results were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Average subcutaneous tissue thickness in babies having a birth weight between 10th and 90th percentile was 5.4 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Singh et al [15] agreed to our results; the birth weight was divided according to the percentile in three groups according to which results were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Average subcutaneous tissue thickness in babies having a birth weight between 10th and 90th percentile was 5.4 mm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Various other researchers have proved a positive correlation between FASTT and BW. [6][7][8] However, most of the work was done in term healthy pregnant women. Hardly, there are any studies to find the correlation between FASTT and BW in a specific population of pregnant women having gestational diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated fetal weight was calculated from the regression equation weight formula: = 0.36 × SCT + 1.284. This formula was used in a study 2014 by Singh et al [9] Results from both formulas were compared with fetal weight obtained by Hadlock formula: log(10) BW = 1.335 − 0.0034 [AC] [FL] + 0.0316 (BPD) + 0.0457 (AC) + 0.1623 (FL) and actual birthweight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%