1983
DOI: 10.1139/f83-200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Fish Production Rates and Associated Variances

Abstract: Variance estimators for fish production rates are explicitly derived for two production models: the instantaneous growth rate and increment summation methods. Statistics for standing stock, mean interval standing stock, instantaneous growth rate, and production:mean standing stock [Formula: see text] ratio are presented. The use of a jackknife estimator is proposed for estimating the variance of instantaneous growth rate. Comparison of the results from both production models provides a method of cross-validati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IGRM calculations were thus made for this single cohort. Confidence intervals were calculated for IGRM estimates by the methods of Newman and Martin (1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IGRM calculations were thus made for this single cohort. Confidence intervals were calculated for IGRM estimates by the methods of Newman and Martin (1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is selection indicated? Statistical differences in annual production estimates were determined based on 95 percent confidence intervals (Newman & Martin 1983). Differences among mean macroinvertebrate densities and among mean prey number per fish stomach were inferred from approximate 95 percent confidence intervals (+ 2 SE).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crayfish were also weighted with a dynamometer to the nearest 1 g and then put back to the pond, excepting in recaptures when a few of them were taken away for laboratory studies. Population numbers are calculated by capturelrecapture method (PETERSEN's method, with variance calculated as by NEWMAN and MARTIN, 1983).…”
Section: Deeper Zone (Not Evaluated)mentioning
confidence: 99%