2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of floc size in highly concentrated calcium carbonate suspension obtained by filtration with dispersant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this equation η 0 and [η] are the zero shear viscosity of the matrix and the intrinsic viscosity of the dispersion, respectively. It was found experimentally that the scaling exponent [η]φ m is like in our results often close to 2, so Equation can be reduced to a one‐parameter equation (Equation ) to describe I 3/1 (γ 0 = 0.32) as a function of filler volume fractiony=(11ϕ/ϕnormalm)Aη(ϕ)/η0=(1ϕ/ϕnormalm)[η]ϕnormalmI3/1(γ0=0.32,ϕ)/I3/1(γ0=0.32,ϕ=0)=(1ϕ/ϕnormalm)2For the samples filled with the N339 CB, a maximum packing fraction φ m of 0.32 (= ^ 100 phr) was found, which is lower than the theoretical value for unimodal spherical particles in closest packing (φ m = 0.74). This is due to the complexer structure of CB aggregates compared to spherical particles and thus the CB cannot pack so closely as hard spheres.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this equation η 0 and [η] are the zero shear viscosity of the matrix and the intrinsic viscosity of the dispersion, respectively. It was found experimentally that the scaling exponent [η]φ m is like in our results often close to 2, so Equation can be reduced to a one‐parameter equation (Equation ) to describe I 3/1 (γ 0 = 0.32) as a function of filler volume fractiony=(11ϕ/ϕnormalm)Aη(ϕ)/η0=(1ϕ/ϕnormalm)[η]ϕnormalmI3/1(γ0=0.32,ϕ)/I3/1(γ0=0.32,ϕ=0)=(1ϕ/ϕnormalm)2For the samples filled with the N339 CB, a maximum packing fraction φ m of 0.32 (= ^ 100 phr) was found, which is lower than the theoretical value for unimodal spherical particles in closest packing (φ m = 0.74). This is due to the complexer structure of CB aggregates compared to spherical particles and thus the CB cannot pack so closely as hard spheres.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Flocculation leads to entrapped water within particles, resulting in a change in the solid volume fraction. To take this into consideration, Soua et al [17] proposed the following modified model, which is an extension of the Krieger-Dougherty equation for flocculated suspensions:…”
Section: Krieger-dougherty Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal structures like hexagonal close packing are unlikely to be the final packing structure for colloidal particles of a nonspherical, irregular shape. Several authors [11,[30][31][32] have arrived at a value between 0.5 and 0.55 as the maximum packing fraction in suspensions of colloidal particles and a value of 0.5 was chosen for φ m . It was also found that changing this value did not have a significant effect on the final results.…”
Section: Shear Modulus and Particle Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%