1942
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.4263.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Haemoglobin by the Alkaline Haematin Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1948
1948
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, the activity of blood δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) was assayed according to the procedure of Berlin and Schaller (1974), whereas blood haemoglobin was determined by the method of Clegg and King (1942) using the cyanomethaemoglobin technique in a Systronic digital Hb meter, model 185. Zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) was determined in a drop of blood with the help of a haematofluorimeter (Model 2060, Aviv, Lakewood, USA) and a calibrated glass slide (Grandjean, 1979).…”
Section: Biochemical Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the activity of blood δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) was assayed according to the procedure of Berlin and Schaller (1974), whereas blood haemoglobin was determined by the method of Clegg and King (1942) using the cyanomethaemoglobin technique in a Systronic digital Hb meter, model 185. Zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) was determined in a drop of blood with the help of a haematofluorimeter (Model 2060, Aviv, Lakewood, USA) and a calibrated glass slide (Grandjean, 1979).…”
Section: Biochemical Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemoglobin concentration of the peripheral blood was determined by the alkaline hematin method (23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of Haemoglobin.-.Haemoglobin was measured as alkaline haematin in the photoelectric colorimeter; the method employed was essentially that of Wu (1922) as used by Clegg and King (1942 King (1937) adapted for the photoelectric colorimeter (King, 1947) was used, with the important modification (King and Wootton, 1948) of diluting the plasma with buffer if the readings were found or expected to exceed one and a half times the standard. This modification leads to considerably higher readings than those given by the original method and no doubt goes a long way towards meeting criticisms of the method (e.g., Gray and Whidborne, 1946).…”
Section: Clinical Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%