2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of interwell connectivity in the case of unmeasured fluctuating bottomhole pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Premised in material-balance and signal analysis, the CRM has been used for about a decade in the context of injector/producer connectivity for understanding waterflood performance. Yousef et al (2006), Sayarpour et al (2009a), and Weber et al (2009) have provided foundation to this CRM tool, whereas other authors have shown practical applications in various settings for waterfloods (Kaviani et al, 2012;Izgec, 2012, Parekh andKabir, 2013), CO 2 floods (Sayarpour et al, 2009b(Sayarpour et al, , 2011, and beyond (Izgec and Kabir 2010), among others. For a pattern of N i number of injectors and N p number of producers, the governing differential equation for this capacitance model is written as (Sayarpour et al, 2009a:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premised in material-balance and signal analysis, the CRM has been used for about a decade in the context of injector/producer connectivity for understanding waterflood performance. Yousef et al (2006), Sayarpour et al (2009a), and Weber et al (2009) have provided foundation to this CRM tool, whereas other authors have shown practical applications in various settings for waterfloods (Kaviani et al, 2012;Izgec, 2012, Parekh andKabir, 2013), CO 2 floods (Sayarpour et al, 2009b(Sayarpour et al, , 2011, and beyond (Izgec and Kabir 2010), among others. For a pattern of N i number of injectors and N p number of producers, the governing differential equation for this capacitance model is written as (Sayarpour et al, 2009a:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing BHP of any producer, the production rates of the rest wells will be changed. When the producer BHP changes, we just shift the expected production rates by a constant rate [17]. Therefore, the modified MLR model can be rewritten as:…”
Section: Interwell Dynamic Connectivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This well geometry has made it possible to interpret the CM connectivity values and relate them to the geological factors controlling fluid flow (e.g., Kaviani et al, 2012;Soroush et al, 2014;and Salazar et al, 2012). Even though the CM is a zero dimensional model, i.e., based on material balance, there has not been inter-horizontal well (HW) connectivity estimation using the CM.…”
Section: Figure 1-diagram and Rate Plots Showing The Masking Effect Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, modified versions of the CM have emerged to estimate more stable and physical parameters when well operating conditions are changing. Kaviani et al (2012) modified the CM to be more tolerant to cases where BHPs are changing but unmeasured and the number of producers is not constant during the time window. They proposed the segmented CM for the absence of BHPs and the compensated CM for cases with producer shut-in periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%