1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(84)90069-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of log-normal quantiles: Monte Carlo results and first-order approximations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were used to 7Q10 values were interpolated (Table 1). The fitting scheme was Stedinger's quantile method, described in Hoshi et al (1984). The corresponding low flow rates in Icicle and Nason Creeks were determined using baseflow regression relationships with the gauging stations located along the Wenatchee River.…”
Section: Fig 1 Wenatchee River Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were used to 7Q10 values were interpolated (Table 1). The fitting scheme was Stedinger's quantile method, described in Hoshi et al (1984). The corresponding low flow rates in Icicle and Nason Creeks were determined using baseflow regression relationships with the gauging stations located along the Wenatchee River.…”
Section: Fig 1 Wenatchee River Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the commonly used frequency distribution functions for prediction of extreme flood values namely Gumbel's extreme value distribution (Ang & Tang, 1984;Gumbel, 1958), Log-Pearson Type II distribution (IACWD, 1982) and Log-normal distribution (Hoshi, Stedinger, & Burges, 1984;Stedinger, 1980) were employed and compared. Gumbel's method, which is one of the most widely preferred and suitable for statistical distribution used for frequency analysis.…”
Section: Flood Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method that does almost as well as the moment method for low-skew distributions, and much better for highly skewed distributions, estimates τ bŷ provided that x (1) + x (n) − 2x 0.50 > 0, where x (1) and x (n) are the smallest and largest observations andx 0:50 is the sample median (Stedinger 1980;Fig. 6.3 Lognormal probability density functions with various standard deviations σ Hoshi et al 1984). If x (1) + x (n) − 2x 0:50 < 0, the sample tends to be negatively skewed and a three-parameter lognormal distribution with a lower bound cannot be fit with this method.…”
Section: ð6:79þmentioning
confidence: 99%