2019
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Radiation Dose in Ct Venography of the Lower Extremities: Phantom Experiments Using Different Automatic Exposure Control Settings and Scan Ranges

Abstract: We performed phantom experiments to assess radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) venography of the lower extremities. CT images of a whole-body phantom were acquired using different automatic exposure control settings and scan ranges, simulating CT venography. Tube current decreased in the lower extremities compared to the trunk. The scout direction and dose modulation strength affected tube current, dose length product (DLP) and effective dose. The middle and distal portions of the lower extremities cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the modification to the S3 condition, the abdomen was excluded from the scan range, and the modulation strength was intensified. While excluding the abdomen should increase %distal DLP, stronger modulation should decrease the relative contribution of the thin lower extremities (Inoue et al 2020). These two effects appeared to cancel each other out, resulting in similar %distal DLP, and consequently in similar %error and ED/DLP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the modification to the S3 condition, the abdomen was excluded from the scan range, and the modulation strength was intensified. While excluding the abdomen should increase %distal DLP, stronger modulation should decrease the relative contribution of the thin lower extremities (Inoue et al 2020). These two effects appeared to cancel each other out, resulting in similar %distal DLP, and consequently in similar %error and ED/DLP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A previous phantom study demonstrated that the simplified method of ED estimation, i.e. multiplication of total DLP by the conversion factor for the trunk, overestimates ED in CT venography of the lower extremities (Inoue et al 2020). In the present study, we compared ED values estimated by the simplified and standard methods using actual patient data, and assessed the degree of overestimation in relation to the imaging conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In CT angiography and CT venography of the lower extremities, although irradiation to the lower extremities contributes significantly to DLP, the contribution to the effective dose is limited because of the low radiosensitivity of the lower extremities. Application of the conversion factor for the trunk leads to a severe overestimation of the effective dose [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Overview Of Ct Radiation Dose Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CT examinations for deep vein thrombosis and lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans may involve a scan ranging from the torso to the lower limbs. In this case, the CTDI vol (z), Dose Length Product (DLP), and effective dose have been used as patient dose indices [9][10][11][12]. The f-factor (DLP to effective dose conversion factor) for the lower limbs is not expressed in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 102 [13], but several studies have been reported [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%