2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(08)60004-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Some Chemical Properties of an Agricultural Soil by Spectroradiometric Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viscarra Rossel et al [26] were unable to achieve such a good result (R 2 = 0.72) with the same regression method when using fewer samples and a lower observed data range. Similar results were also presented by Jarmer et al [27], who performed PLSR analyses with ASD FieldSpec-II spectra and obtained an R 2 value of 0.62.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Viscarra Rossel et al [26] were unable to achieve such a good result (R 2 = 0.72) with the same regression method when using fewer samples and a lower observed data range. Similar results were also presented by Jarmer et al [27], who performed PLSR analyses with ASD FieldSpec-II spectra and obtained an R 2 value of 0.62.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There is no evidence of interaction between iron oxides and spectral data in mid-IR and its lower second-order modeling for the training step was possible because its correlation with SiO 2 (r: 0.67) and Al 2 O 3 (r: 0.76). Comparing R 2 and RMSE, vis-NIR modeling of Fe 2 O 3 content was less effective than those obtained by Fernandes et al (2004) and Richter et al (2009) but similar or higher than the results reached by Ben-Dor and Banin (1995), Dunn et al (2002), Sorensen and Dalsgaard (2005), Jarmer et al (2008), and Summers et al (2011). Also, prediction quality for iron oxide content in mid-IR was equivalent to that obtained by Bertrand et al (2002).…”
Section: Mineralogical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Knowledge of the quantity and the spatial distribution of harvest residues are important for the determination of surface properties. Hyperspectral (HS) remote sensing is used in agriculture, mapping crop characteristics (Jarmer, 2013;Thenkabail, 2000), the assessment of crop residues (Daughtry, 2004) and the assessment of soil properties (Jarmer et al, 2008;Barnes and Baker, 2000). The captured mixed signal in case of existing harvest residues can be interpreted and considered in further analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%