2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12594-009-0151-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of static stress changes after the 2001 Bhuj earthquake: Implications towards the northward spatial migration of the seismic activity in Kachchh, Gujarat

Abstract: Spatial-temporal patterns of aftershocks of the 2001 Mw7.7 Bhuj earthquake during 2001-2008 reveal a northward spatial migration of seismic activity in the Kachchh seismic zone, which could be related with the loading stresses caused by the continued occurrences of aftershocks on the north Wagad fault (NWF), the causative fault of the 2001-mainshock. Aiming at explaining the observed northward migration of activity, we modelled the Coulomb failure stress change (DCFS) produced by the 2001-mainshock, the 2006 M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1845 earthquake (M w > 7) resulted in the flooding of Kori river and also uplifted Sunda area by 1 m located about 40 km south of Allah Bund [17][18][19] . The 1956 Anjar earthquake (M w 6.1) was a moderate magnitude event that occurred during post-instrumentation period with no surface rupture reported 20 . One of the most damaging intraplate earthquakes was experienced on 26 January 2001 (M w 7.6) that occurred in the failed rift of Kachchh on a blind thrust and resulted in vast destruction and casualties ( Figure 1 …”
Section: Historical Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1845 earthquake (M w > 7) resulted in the flooding of Kori river and also uplifted Sunda area by 1 m located about 40 km south of Allah Bund [17][18][19] . The 1956 Anjar earthquake (M w 6.1) was a moderate magnitude event that occurred during post-instrumentation period with no surface rupture reported 20 . One of the most damaging intraplate earthquakes was experienced on 26 January 2001 (M w 7.6) that occurred in the failed rift of Kachchh on a blind thrust and resulted in vast destruction and casualties ( Figure 1 …”
Section: Historical Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The region is seismically active and experienced two large earthquakes (M w 7.8, 1819, Kachchh and M w 7.6, 2001, Bhuj) within 200 years, besides several moderate size earthquakes (Johnston 1994;Rajendran and Rajendran 2001). The aftershock activity of 2001 Bhuj earthquake is still continuing (Mandal 2009). The Institute of Seismological Research has installed a network of 50 strong motion accelerographs in the Gujarat region.…”
Section: Seismotectonics and Geology Of The Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The migration of seismicity observed during the 1997 Umbria-Marche (Italy) earthquake has been explained successfully through diffusion of a porepressure perturbation (generated by the coseismic stress changes associated with the mainshock) in a poro-elastic, fluid-saturated medium (Antonioli et al 2005). In Kachchh, the occurrences of three earthquakes (viz., M w 7.7 2001 mainshock, and M w 5.6 2005 and M w 4.9 2010 Kachchh events) have been related to the triggering through static stress changes (To et al 2006;Mandal 2009a). But, the seismicity pattern reveals that seismicity migrated to and activated both the Gedi and Allah-Bund faults in Kachchh, Gujarat, India, before the occurrences of impending mainshocks Mandal 2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kachchh, the occurrences of three earthquakes (viz., M w 7.7 2001 mainshock, and M w 5.6 2005 and M w 4.9 2010 Kachchh events) have been related to the triggering through static stress changes (To et al 2006;Mandal 2009a). But, the seismicity pattern reveals that seismicity migrated to and activated both the Gedi and Allah-Bund faults in Kachchh, Gujarat, India, before the occurrences of impending mainshocks Mandal 2009a). Now, if we assume that the co-and post-seismic stress changes associated with the 2001 mainshock have promoted fluid flow in the aftershock zone, facilitating the migration of seismicity, then, it would be important to reinterpret the model of observed migration in Kachchh seismicity in terms of fluid flow and pore-pressure relaxation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%