Estimation of submarine groundwater discharge from bulk ground electrical conductivity measurements

Abstract

The utility of bulk ground conductivity (BGC) measurements in the estimation of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) was investigated at four sites covering a range of hydrogeological settings, namely Cockburn Sound (Australia); Shelter Island (USA); Ubatuba Bay (Brazil) and Flic‐en‐Flac Bay (Mauritius). At each of the sites, BGC was surveyed in the intertidal zone, and seepage meters were used for direct measurements of SGD flow rates. In the presence of detectable salinity gradients in the sediment, a negative correlation between SGD and BGC was recorded. The correlation is site‐specific and is dependent on both the type of sediment and the mixing processes. For example, at Shelter Island the maximum mean flow rates were 65 cm d−1 at a BGC of ∼0 mS cm−1 while at Mauritius maximum mean flow rates were 364 cm d−1 at a BGC of ∼0 mS cm−1. BGC measurements are used to estimate SGD over a large scale, and to separate its fresh and saline components. Extrapolating BGC measurements throughout the study sites yields a total discharge of 2.91, 1.59, 7.16, and 25.4 103 m3 d−1 km−1 of shoreline with a freshwater fraction of 41, 24, 29, and 63% at Cockburn Sound, Shelter Island, Ubatuba Bay, and Flic‐en‐Flac Bay respectively. The results demonstrate that ground conductivity is a useful tracer to survey and separate freshwater and recirculated seawater component of SGD. The presented investigation is a subset within a series of experiments designed to compare different methods to investigate SGD co‐organized and carried out by SCOR, LOICZ, IOC and IAEA.

Delineating coastal groundwater discharge processes in a wetland area by means of electrical resistivity imaging, 224Ra and 222Rn

“…Viezzoli et al, 2010); both groundbased and airborne thermal measurements (Taniguchi, 2000;Moore et al, 2002;Johnson et al, 2008;Danielescu et al, 2009) and electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) (e.g. Swarzenski et al, 2006Swarzenski et al, , 2007Stieglitz et al, 2008;Swarzenski and Izbicki, 2009;Cardenas et al, 2010;Nakada et al, 2011). However, physical and logistical constraints may restrict the application of some of these methodologies to the study of inland CGD.…”

Investigation of submarine groundwater discharge to tidal rivers: Evidence for regional and local scale seepage

“…In comparison, identified ground‐based TIR anomalies along the Forge River intertidal study area were only observed adjacent to dock‐pilings (Figure b). This phenomenon has been previously observed, where anthropogenic structures act to puncture the aquifer, increasing the local hydraulic head and subsequent groundwater flow (Burnett et al ., ; Stieglitz, Rapaglia, & Bokuniewicz, ).…”

Characterising the distribution of near-shore submarine groundwater discharge along a coastline using222Rn and electrical conductivity

“…isotopes of the water molecule, CFCs and methane; Burnett et al 2006), geophysical and remote sensing measurements (e.g. ground conductivity and temperature; Stieglitz et al 2008;Wilson & Rocha 2012), seepage meters (e.g. Lee-type and heat-pulse seepage meters; Lee 1977; Taniguchi et al 2003) or numerical modelling (e.g.…”