2003
DOI: 10.2514/2.2035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Flowfield from Surface Pressure Measurements in an Open Cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, examination of the correlation between the PIV measurements revealed that there was some level of correlation, although relatively small, between the surface pressure and the velocity for most locations in the shear layer. These low levels are in contrast to similar correlations observed in numerical simulation results of an open cavity in a Mach 1.5 flow as reported in Murray and Ukeiley (2003). This is due to the fact that in the numerical simulations the cavity was dominated by a resonant condition, and the additional noise that is inherent to physical experiments was absent.…”
Section: Velocity-pressure Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…However, examination of the correlation between the PIV measurements revealed that there was some level of correlation, although relatively small, between the surface pressure and the velocity for most locations in the shear layer. These low levels are in contrast to similar correlations observed in numerical simulation results of an open cavity in a Mach 1.5 flow as reported in Murray and Ukeiley (2003). This is due to the fact that in the numerical simulations the cavity was dominated by a resonant condition, and the additional noise that is inherent to physical experiments was absent.…”
Section: Velocity-pressure Correlationscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The computation of these coefficients which is time independent is similar to the one proposed by Murray and Ukeiley [37].…”
Section: Quadratic Stochastic Estimation (Qse)mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Based on the same motivation of predicting velocity fields, linear stochastic estimation (LSE) as first introduced by Adrian [29] has also been used for the same purpose. Examples of this can be found in the work of Glauser [26], Hudy [27], Murray [33] and Taylor [35], who have used LSE in combination with scalar pressure measurements to obtain a complete description of the velocity fields for different geometries, such as backward facing steps, axi-symmetric jets and cavities. Various extensions of LSE have been explored in the work of Hudy [27], Tinney [32] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%