2020
DOI: 10.1121/1.5147826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the frequency of occurence of italian phonemes in text

Abstract: The purpose of this project was to derive a reliable estimate of the frequency of occurrence of the 30 phonemes -plus consonant geminated counterparts-of the Italian language, based on four selected written texts. Since no comparable dataset was found in previous literature, the present analysis may serve as a reference in future studies. Four textual sources were considered: Come si fa una tesi di laurea: le materie umanistiche by Umberto Eco, I promessi sposi by Alessandro Manzoni, a recent article in Corrie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LaMIT database was designed to reflect the typical frequency of occurrence of the different phonemes in the Italian language, as suggested by a recent study (Arango et al, 2021;Arango et al, 2020) that provides updated values of the phonemic frequencies, assuming the existence of 30 phonemes as identified by Muljacic (1972): (1) 7 vowels: /a/, /i/, /u/, /e/, /E/, /o/, /O/; (2) 21 consonants: /p/, /b/, /f/, /v/, /t/, /d/, /ts/, /dz/, /s/, /z/, /k/, /g/, /D/, /T/, /S/, /m/, /n/, /fi/, /l/, /k/, /r/; (3) 2 glides: /j/ and /w/. Allophones are excluded, consistent with the theoretical framework provided by Muljacic (1972).…”
Section: Experimentation: Gemination In Spoken Sentencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LaMIT database was designed to reflect the typical frequency of occurrence of the different phonemes in the Italian language, as suggested by a recent study (Arango et al, 2021;Arango et al, 2020) that provides updated values of the phonemic frequencies, assuming the existence of 30 phonemes as identified by Muljacic (1972): (1) 7 vowels: /a/, /i/, /u/, /e/, /E/, /o/, /O/; (2) 21 consonants: /p/, /b/, /f/, /v/, /t/, /d/, /ts/, /dz/, /s/, /z/, /k/, /g/, /D/, /T/, /S/, /m/, /n/, /fi/, /l/, /k/, /r/; (3) 2 glides: /j/ and /w/. Allophones are excluded, consistent with the theoretical framework provided by Muljacic (1972).…”
Section: Experimentation: Gemination In Spoken Sentencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future work, it would be useful to examine what other phonetic factors such as manner and place of articulation affect listeners’ consonant length perception (e.g. Arango et al, 2021; Liu, 2014). As Japanese uses both consonant and vowel duration contrastively, we would like to assess listeners’ length perception of different classes of sounds to confirm or disconfirm whether vowel length contrasts do indeed ‘pose little problems’ (Altmann et al, 2012) and consonantal length contrasts prove ‘to be difficult’ (Altmann et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LaMIT database was designed so to reflect the typical frequency of occurrence of the different phonemes in the Italian language, as suggested by a recent study (Arango et al, 2020a), (Arango et al, 2020b) that provides updated values of the phonemic frequencies, Il fato ancora vs. Il fatto ancora, highlighting the lengthening of consonant and shortening of preceding vowel associated to gemination, as described in (Esposito and Di Benedetto, 1999).…”
Section: Experimentation: Gemination In Spoken Sen-tencesmentioning
confidence: 99%