2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac2b8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the historical radiation dose of Korean radiation workers, 1961–1983

Abstract: Accurate dosimetry plays a key role in evaluating the radiation-induced health risks of radiation workers. The National Dose Registry in Korea contains the dose records of radiation workers in nuclear-related occupations since 1984. Thus, radiation doses for workers before 1984 are often sparse or missing. This study aimed to estimate the historical radiation dose before 1984 for radiation workers in Korea based on dose reconstruction models. The dose reconstruction models were derived from the nationwide self… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, radiation doses before 1984 were not included in this study due to a lack of information in the dose registry. However, doses before 1984 may have been higher than those in the succeeding years, based on the exposure scenario estimated by Lee et al (2021). Third, there was a lack of information regarding radiation doses for workers in military institutions before 2006 since regulatory coverage to manage radiation doses for military workers started in 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, radiation doses before 1984 were not included in this study due to a lack of information in the dose registry. However, doses before 1984 may have been higher than those in the succeeding years, based on the exposure scenario estimated by Lee et al (2021). Third, there was a lack of information regarding radiation doses for workers in military institutions before 2006 since regulatory coverage to manage radiation doses for military workers started in 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%