2008
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2008.11917738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of σ for Individuals Charts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control charts based on these standard estimates perform reasonably well under the usual assumptions that observations come from a normal distribution but are known to be inefficient when the assumption of normality is violated. Many authors have reported in their studies that because of non‐normality, the estimation of σ is affected more than the estimation of μ (see the works by Burr, and Braun and Park). Researchers have investigated different estimates of σ with the aim of improving the efficiency and robustness of control charts' performance (see the works by Cryer and Ryan, Cruthis and Rigdon, Derman and Ross, and Chen).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control charts based on these standard estimates perform reasonably well under the usual assumptions that observations come from a normal distribution but are known to be inefficient when the assumption of normality is violated. Many authors have reported in their studies that because of non‐normality, the estimation of σ is affected more than the estimation of μ (see the works by Burr, and Braun and Park). Researchers have investigated different estimates of σ with the aim of improving the efficiency and robustness of control charts' performance (see the works by Cryer and Ryan, Cruthis and Rigdon, Derman and Ross, and Chen).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the screening of outliers to help improve the performance of other estimators is something that can be analyzed with both MTCC and TCC. For instance, Braun and Park (2008), when dealing with independent individual observations on Phase I, evaluated the reduction in the mean squared error of several "outlier-robust" estimators of , by doing a previous screening activity with an x-chart constructed with Boyles's 1997 estimator for , the median absolute deviation. MTCC and TCC have the advantage, over Boyles's method, that no parameters have to be estimated for the screening activity, and they are suitable for normal, and nonnormal distributions, TCC when symmetry can be assumed, and MTCC when it cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sim and Wong used estimated probability limits to study R chart properties when observations follow exponential, Laplace, and logistic distributions. Braun and Park investigated a large number of standard deviations when sample size was 300 to show the effect of outliers and bimodality on the performance of EWMA charts. Abbasi et al evaluated performance of a wide range of possible phase I dispersion charts such as R , S , and MD for non‐normal process distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%