Many animals alter their anti-predator behavior in accordance to the
threat level of a predator. While much research has examined variation in mobbing
responses to different predators, few studies have investigated how anti-predator
behavior is affected by changes in a predator’s own state or behavior. We examined
the effect of sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus)
behavior on the mobbing response of wild blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) using robotic taxidermy sparrowhawks. We
manipulated whether the simulated predator moved its head, produced vocalizations,
or held a taxidermy blue tit in its talons. When any sparrowhawk model was
present, blue tits decreased foraging and increased anti-predator behavior and
vocalizations. Additionally, each manipulation of the model predator’s state
(moving, vocalizing, or the presence of a dead conspecific) impacted different
types of blue tit anti-predator behavior and vocalizations. These results indicate
that different components of mobbing vary according to the specific state of a
given predator—beyond its presence or absence—and suggest that each might play a
different role in the overall mobbing response. Last, our results indicate that
using more life-like predator stimuli—those featuring simple head movements and
audio playback of vocalizations—changes how prey respond to the predator; these
‘robo-raptor’ models provide a powerful tool to provide increased realism in
simulated predator encounters without sacrificing experimental control.Significance statementAnti-predatory behavior is often modulated by the threat level posed
by a particular predator. While much research has tested how different types of
predators change prey behavior, few experiments have examined how predator
behavior affects anti-predatory responses of prey. By experimentally manipulating
robotic predators, we show that blue tits not only respond to the presence of a
sparrowhawk, by decreasing feeding and increasing anti-predator behavior and
vocalizations, but that they vary specific anti-predator behaviors when
encountering differently behaving predators (moving, vocalizing, or those with
captured prey), suggesting that prey pay attention to their predators’ state and
behavior.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2361-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized
users.