1997
DOI: 10.14490/jjss1995.27.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimations of Income Distribution Parameters for Individual Observations by Maximum Likelihood Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the dissimilar features of income distribution in various countries and regions during different periods; that is, no distribution function was universal. For example, Tachibanaki et al [51] employed six commonly used distribution functions to research the income distribution of residents in Japan. McDonald [42] and McDonald and Xu [52] 1970,1975,1980,1985,1990, and 1995.…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the dissimilar features of income distribution in various countries and regions during different periods; that is, no distribution function was universal. For example, Tachibanaki et al [51] employed six commonly used distribution functions to research the income distribution of residents in Japan. McDonald [42] and McDonald and Xu [52] 1970,1975,1980,1985,1990, and 1995.…”
Section: Journal Of Applied Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative three-parameter approach that giving a good representation of income distributions in practice is provided by the Pareto-Lévy class (Mandelbrot 1960, Dagsvik et al 2013; unfortunately, except in a few cases, the probability distributions associated with this class cannot be represented in closed form. Dagum (1977Dagum ( , 1980Dagum ( , 1983, McDonald (1984), Butler and McDonald (1989), Majumder and Chakravarty (1990), McDonald and Xu (1995), Bantilan et al (1995), Victoria-Feser (1995, Brachmann et al (1996), Bordley et al (1997), Tachibanaki et al (1997) and Bandourian et al (2003). In most of these empirical studies, the generalized beta of the second kind, the Singh-Maddala and the Dagum distributions perform better than other two/three parameter distributions.…”
Section: Generalized Betamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where a, b, q > 0 and r < 1 2q . When r = 0 (and a = α, b = β, q = 1 2κ ) the EκG1 quantile function is equivalent to that of the κ-generalized distribution-compare with (43).…”
Section: Four-parameter Extensions Of the κ-Generalized Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%