1992
DOI: 10.2307/2389015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimators of Fruit Abundance of Tropical Trees

Abstract: Many types of biological studies require the estimation of food abundance in tropical forests, and a variety of methods have been used to estimate this parameter. Here we compare the accuracy and precision of three methods for estimating the fruit abundance (biomass and number) of tropical tree species: tree diameter, crown volume, and visual estimation. Diameter at breast height (DBH) was the most consistently accurate method and exhibited low levels of interobserver variability. Generally, crown volume was n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
232
0
16

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
232
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Two indicators of nesting site quality were additionally measured: nest height and tree diameter. Nest height was taken from the ground to the bottom of the nest with a precision of 0.5 m. Nest tree diameter was measured at breast height 1.2 m above the ground to the nearest 1 mm, and was treated as an indicator of tree size (Chapman et al 1992). Despite the presence of deep watercourses and water pools where willow shrubs could not develop, the structure of the stand and tree density was fairly homogenous across the colony and availability of high nesting trees was not limited at the peripheries of the colony even late in the season.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two indicators of nesting site quality were additionally measured: nest height and tree diameter. Nest height was taken from the ground to the bottom of the nest with a precision of 0.5 m. Nest tree diameter was measured at breast height 1.2 m above the ground to the nearest 1 mm, and was treated as an indicator of tree size (Chapman et al 1992). Despite the presence of deep watercourses and water pools where willow shrubs could not develop, the structure of the stand and tree density was fairly homogenous across the colony and availability of high nesting trees was not limited at the peripheries of the colony even late in the season.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees with wide and more highly branched crowns promote greater seed abundance beneath them (McDonnell & Stiles 1983;Holl 1998;Cole et al 2010;Derroire et al 2016) and can serve as attractive environments for seed dispersers and will provide the immediate microclimate for seed germination and seedling growth (Belsky et al 1989;Callaway 2007;Derroire et al 2016). Trees with a larger diameters and hollows in their trunks are important for many bird species (Mazurek & Zielinski 2004), and trees with larger diameters have greater crown coverage and more branches, and will produce more flowers and seeds (Chapman et al 1992;Greene & Johnson 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit and liana abundance tend to correlate positively with diameter at breast height (dbh) in the tropics (Chapman et al, 1992;Leighton and Leighton, 1982;Stevenson, 2001;Zurring et al, 1993), though the precise relationship between the variables is arguable (Ganzhorn et al, 1999;Janson and Chapman, 1999). Thus, correlations between densities of Cheirogaleus major and tree diameter may reflect edge-related variations in feeding ecology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%