2017
DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2017.1372571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estradiol in hormonal contraception: real evolution or just same old wine in a new bottle?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the most important limitation of this molecule is that it is still used in oral contraceptives only with synthetic estrogens such as EE, even at medium-high dosages (up to 35 µg). In the last years, the market of CHCs has been evolving toward a reduction of EE dose and more metabolically neutral estrogens such as E2 [29] and estetrol (E4) [70] and toward products that will be able to administer these weaker estrogens by non-oral ways of administration [30]. NGM would probably not be suitable for use in these formulations that require progestins with a more uterotropic effect (such as DNG, nomegestrol acetate or nestorone) [29], as NETA and DSG were not, mainly for the not satisfactory cycle control [71,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the most important limitation of this molecule is that it is still used in oral contraceptives only with synthetic estrogens such as EE, even at medium-high dosages (up to 35 µg). In the last years, the market of CHCs has been evolving toward a reduction of EE dose and more metabolically neutral estrogens such as E2 [29] and estetrol (E4) [70] and toward products that will be able to administer these weaker estrogens by non-oral ways of administration [30]. NGM would probably not be suitable for use in these formulations that require progestins with a more uterotropic effect (such as DNG, nomegestrol acetate or nestorone) [29], as NETA and DSG were not, mainly for the not satisfactory cycle control [71,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired hypercoagulability seems to be independent of the route of administration of EE [26], but directly dependent on its dose [27,28]. Substitution of EE by oral E2, as performed in the last 10 years, may reduce but not abolish the coagulation stimulus of CHCs [29], though the transdermal/vaginal route of administration would be more neutral in comparison to the oral one [30].…”
Section: Effect Of the Estrogenic Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'estradiolo, venendo riconosciuto come estrogeno naturale, contrariamente all'etinilestradiolo, viene catabolizzato nel fegato a estrone (E1) ed estriolo (E3). Inoltre, ha un minor impatto sulla pressione arteriosa, dal momento che rispetto all'etinilestradiolo induce una minor sintesi epatica di angiotensinogeno [31].…”
Section: Composizione Dei Contraccettivi Ormonali: Componente Estroge...unclassified
“…Los más seguros son los que contienen LNG o norgestimato, sin que existan diferencias en función de la vía de administración 116 , 117 . Los nuevos preparados con estradiol, frente a los clásicos con etinilestradiol (EE), buscan la reducción del riesgo de TEV, sin significación estadística hasta ahora, y se necesitan series más grandes para sacar conclusiones 118 .…”
Section: Anticoncepciónunclassified