1975
DOI: 10.1016/0039-128x(75)90081-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogen receptor in rat liver and its dependence on prolactin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
30
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The centrilobular P-ERK1/2 staining pattern in the liver was surprising. Yet, it is well known that the different zones in a hepatic lobule have different functional properties (Chiquoine 1953;Cohen et al 1997;Tsutsumi et al 1989), that hepatocytes express estrogen as well as progesterone receptors (Chamness, Costlow, and McGuire 1975;Haukkamaa 1976), and that estrogen and progesterone have biological effects in the liver (O'Mahony, Thomas, and Harvey 2009;Schindler 2007). This supports that the observed centrilobular staining pattern for P-ERK1/2 and the dependency of the estrous cycle is biologically plausible (Figures 5E and 5F).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The centrilobular P-ERK1/2 staining pattern in the liver was surprising. Yet, it is well known that the different zones in a hepatic lobule have different functional properties (Chiquoine 1953;Cohen et al 1997;Tsutsumi et al 1989), that hepatocytes express estrogen as well as progesterone receptors (Chamness, Costlow, and McGuire 1975;Haukkamaa 1976), and that estrogen and progesterone have biological effects in the liver (O'Mahony, Thomas, and Harvey 2009;Schindler 2007). This supports that the observed centrilobular staining pattern for P-ERK1/2 and the dependency of the estrous cycle is biologically plausible (Figures 5E and 5F).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…2) is equivalent to that reported for the specific oestrogen receptor sedimentating in the 8S region of sucrose gradients (Powell-Jones et al, 1980); (2) the absence of any sex difference in the amount of [3Hloestradiol binding to peak I is in agreement with previous studies Powell-Jones et al, 1980); (3) the ligand specificity of peak I (Table 1) is analogous to that described for the specific receptor (Chamness et al, 1975;Beers & Rosner, 1977;Powell-Jones et al, 1980); (4) the decrease in the amount of [3Hloestradiol binding to peak I resulting from hypophysectomy ( Fig. 8) is in accord with previous reports that hypophysectomy markedly decreases concentrations of hepatic oestrogen receptors (Chamness et al, 1975;Beers & Rosner, 1977;Powell-Jones et al, 1980). Several enzyme systems exhibit large postVol.…”
Section: Effect Ofgonadectomy On Oestrogen-binding Proteinssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Increases in hepatic synthesis of plasma renin substrate in rat (Eisenfeld et al, 1977) as well as increases in mRNA sequences for lipoprotein and vitellogenin in avian liver (Deeley & Goldberger, 1979;Chan et al, 1979) have been directly correlated with the presence of oestrogens. The demonstration that hormone binds to a specific cytoplasmic receptor in rat liver (Eisenfeld, 1974;Powell-Jones et al, 1976;Chamness et al, 1975;Viladiu et al, 1975) followed by nuclear translocation of the hormone-receptor complex (Aten et Vol. 194 al., 1978;Powell-Jones et al, 1978) suggests that the liver is a target organ for oestrogens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the decrease in hepatic cytosolic estrogen receptor content seen after hypophysectomy can be restored partially by the administration of exogenous prolactin (26). Recently it has been shown that the administration of cyclosporine to rats causes an increase in their prolactin levels (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%