Estrogenic Activity of a Dieldrin/Toxaphene Mixture in the Mouse Uterus, MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells, and Yeast-Based Estrogen Receptor Assays: No Apparent Synergism

Abstract

The estrogenic activity of dieldrin, toxaphene, and an equimolar mixture of both compounds (dieldrin/toxaphene) was investigated in the 21-day-old B6C3F1 mouse uterus, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, and in yeast-based reporter gene assays. Treatment of the animals with 17beta-estradiol (E2) (0.0053 kg/day x3) resulted in a 3.1-, 4.8-, and 7.8-fold increase in uterine wet weight, peroxidase activity, and progesterone receptor binding, respectively. In contrast, treatment with 2.5, 15 and 60 micromol/kg (x3) doses of toxaphene, dieldrin, or dieldrin/toxaphene (equimolar) did not significantly induce a dose-dependent increase in any of the E2-induced responses. The organochlorine pesticides alone and the binary mixture did not bind to the mouse uterine estrogen receptor (ER) in a competitive binding assay using [3H]E2 as the radioligand. In parallel studies, estrogenic activities were determined in MCF-7 cells by using a cell proliferation assay and by determining induction of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with plasmids containing estrogen-responsive 5'-promoter regions from the rat creatine kinase B and human cathepsin D genes. E2 caused a 24-fold increase in CAT activity in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with creatine kinase B and a 3.8-fold increase in cells transiently transfected with the human cathepsin D construct. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with dieldrin, toxaphene, or an equimolar mixture of dieldrin plus toxaphene (10(-8)-10(-5) M) did not significantly induce cell proliferation or CAT activity in the transient transfection experiment with both plasmids. The relative competitive binding of the organochlorine pesticides was determined by incubating MCF-7 cells with 10(-9) M [3H]E2 in the presence or absence of 2 x 10(-7) M unlabeled E2 (to determine nonspecific binding), toxaphene (10(-5) M), dieldrin (10(-5) M), and equimolar concentrations of the dieldrin plus toxaphene mixture (10(-5) M). The binding observed for [3H]E2 in the whole cell extracts was displaced by unlabeled E2, whereas the organochlorine pesticides and binary mixture exhibited minimal to nondetectable competitive binding activity. E2 caused a 5000-fold induction of beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) activity in yeast transformed with the human ER and a double estrogen responsive element upstream of the beta-gal reporter gene. Treatment with 10(-6)-10(-4) M chlordane, dieldrin, toxaphene, or an equimolar mixture of dieldrin/toxaphene did not induce activity, whereas 10(-4) M endosulfan caused a 2000-fold increase in beta-gal activity. Diethylstilbestrol caused a 20-fold increase in activity in yeast transformed with the mouse ER and a single estrogen responsive element upstream of the beta-gal reporter gene. Dieldrin, chlordane, toxaphene, and endosulfan induced a 1.5- to 4-fold increase in activity at a concentration of 2.5 x 10(-5) M. Synergistic transactivation was not observed for any equimolar binary mixture of the pesticides at concentrations of either 2.5 x 10(-5) M or 2.5 x...

Toxicity of Mixtures of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Biphenyls Determined by Dose-Response Curve Analysis

“…The interactions of both potent and weak Ah receptor agonists to give nonadditive interactions has previously been reported from multiple laboratories and summarised in a recent review (Safe 1998). The non-additive antagonistic interactions between various PHAH are also consistent with results obtained for other ligand-induced transcription factors such as the estrogen receptor (ER) where PHAH such as PCB153: exhibit tissue specific weak ER aginist/antagonist activities (Ashby et al 1997;Gaido et al 1997;Ramamoorthy et al 1997). …”

Assessing the Detoxication Efficiencies of Wastewater Treatment Processes Using a Battery of Bioassays/Biomarkers

“…Bioassay based on biomarker is promising due to its molecular and biological simplicity, easy handling, and low costs (Ramamoorthy et al 1997). In addition, this assay is valuable because it is able to indicate a potential mechanism of action as well as to account for synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions that may occur with a complex mixture.…”

Endocrine disruptors and falling sperm counts: lessons learned or not!

“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] Assays determining ER binding or transactivation are useful but do not predict SERM-like activity, and our results actually support, in part, the EDC hypothesis where it can be hypothesized that a so-called 'weak' estrogen such as BPA may be more potent in some tissues during specific periods of development. In collaboration with Drs Kevin Gaido (Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology), Donald McDonnell (Duke University) and Ken Korach (National Institutes for Environmental Health Sciences), we also showed that interactions of several environmental estrogens were additive 38,39 and this refuted a paper in Science claiming 'synergistic' interactions of environmental estrogens. 40 This discovery of synergistic activity for some estrogenic EDCs was covered by the news media worldwide; however, our results and the subsequent retraction of the Science paper were barely mentioned in the press.…”