2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2021.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudios métricos del Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR): ¿Un caso de inducción de la validez?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both items seem to share additional variance to the latent construct and may be significant indicators of anxiety as a similar but different unit to the rest of the GAD-7 items. This does not suggest the transferability of the validity results of the GAD-2 from the GAD-7 in the present study, and it is necessary to avoid inferring its validity from our results with the GAD-7 in workers ( 36 , 37 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both items seem to share additional variance to the latent construct and may be significant indicators of anxiety as a similar but different unit to the rest of the GAD-7 items. This does not suggest the transferability of the validity results of the GAD-2 from the GAD-7 in the present study, and it is necessary to avoid inferring its validity from our results with the GAD-7 in workers ( 36 , 37 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Although there are several psychometric studies around world [e.g., (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)], and at least 16 validation studies there is focus in various languages (including Spanish-speaking), in various specific samples and contexts (35) on the GAD-7, one cannot infer the validity of an instrument in a certain population by extracting validity information from other studies, for example from different cultures (36,37), because this does not guarantee that the induced parameters are exactly preserved. Therefore, it is imperative to examine the psychometric properties of the GAD-7 in samples other than the clinical and general population, since the GAD-7 is being frequently used in the work context in Puerto Rico (e.g., (12,13,38)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another point that stands out from the brief systematic review of the WRRS is that in the studies that did not use SEM, they presumed that the WRRS was a valid instrument without examining it with their sample. This tends to be a bad practice widely used in psychological studies, which has been pointed out by some authors ( Merino-Soto and Calderón-De la Cruz, 2018 ; Merino-Soto and Angulo-Ramos, 2020 , 2021 ) in the literature indicating that researchers ARe inducing the validity of the instrument, which is called as measurement validity induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the association between the two constructs measured by SRQ-L (autonomy and control) varied between the compared semester groups, indicating a possible evolution of these constructs aligned with their dependency. Although these results point to a more complete and optimal psychometric characterization of SRQ-L, the possible intercultural variability should be evaluated and avoided inducing its validity from one or more studies [86][87][88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%