2016
DOI: 10.15689/ap.2016.1503.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudos psicométricos de instrumentos de ansiedade no contexto esportivo: uma revisão sistemática

Abstract: RESUMOO presente artigo objetivou mapear e descrever os estudos de evidências de validade e precisão de instrumentos para avaliação de ansiedade no contexto das competições esportivas. ABSTRACT -Psychometric studies on anxiety instruments in the sporting context: a systematic review This article aimed to map and describe scientific studies on the evidences of validity of instruments to assess anxiety within the context of sporting competitions. Studies in full text and with no restrictions regarding its year o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to validity evidence based on content, the authors of the theoretical model and international measures (Cheng et al, 2009;2011) indicate that they performed procedures to collect them, but no results are reported in their research articles, which does not allow the comparison of its results with those of the present research. Teixeira, Nunes and Cruz (2016) carried out a systematic review about the strategies of searching for evidence of validity used in several studies about instruments to evaluate anxiety in the sport context. There was a shortage of use and reporting of procedures performed to gather evidence based on content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to validity evidence based on content, the authors of the theoretical model and international measures (Cheng et al, 2009;2011) indicate that they performed procedures to collect them, but no results are reported in their research articles, which does not allow the comparison of its results with those of the present research. Teixeira, Nunes and Cruz (2016) carried out a systematic review about the strategies of searching for evidence of validity used in several studies about instruments to evaluate anxiety in the sport context. There was a shortage of use and reporting of procedures performed to gather evidence based on content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of physiological symptoms and signs have been attempted, ranging from changes in heart rate, exaggerated tension in the temporomandibular joint, to symptoms such as a feeling of suffocation. Other studies included in the literature review helped to complement the definitions, as well as in writing the items (e. g. Carver & Scheier, 1986;Eysenck, 1992;Hanton, Neil, & Mellalieu, 2011;Jones, 1995;Martens et al, 1990;Ohman, 2000;Smith, Smoll, Cumming, & Grossbard, 2006;Smith, Smoll, & Schutz, 1990;Spielberger, 1966;Teixeira, Nunes, & Cruz, 2016).…”
Section: Elaboration Of the Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enquanto pesquisas, inúmeras pesquisas foram conduzidas com os instrumentos citados acima, tendo como público-alvo atletas de esportes individuais (ALEJO et al, 2020;FORTES et al, 2017;HAGAN;POLLMANN;SCHACK, 2017;SILVA et al, 2021;TERTULIANO et al, 2019)., atletas de esportes coletivos (ARRUDA et al, 2017;FERREIRA et al, 2021;GUERRERO;FERNANDES, 2021;MARENUCCI et al, 2020;MILAVIĆ;JURKO;GRGANTOV, 2013;NASCIMENTO JUNIOR et al, 2016;PAES et al, 2016;PONS et al, 2018;SANTANA et al, 2020), e ambos (FERNANDES et al, 2013b;FERNANDES, 2012b;PALUDO et al, 2016;CRUZ, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…To measure these components, Martens, Burton, Vealey, Bump & Smith (1990b) developed the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory 2 (CSAI-2). Studies have shown that these dimensions of competitive anxiety tend to be influenced by variables such as gender, modality and level of skill and competitive experience (Woodman & Hardy, 2003;Fernandes, Nunes, Vasconcelos-Raposo & Fernandes, 2013;Teixeira, Nunes & Cruz, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%