2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etched glass surfaces, atomic force microscopy and stochastic analysis

Abstract: The effect of etching time scale of glass surface on its statistical properties has been studied using atomic force microscopy technique. We have characterized the complexity of the height fluctuation of a etched surface by the stochastic parameters such as intermittency exponents, roughness, roughness exponents, drift and diffusion coefficients and find their variations in terms of the etching time.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the films deposited at different sputtering gas pressures have different thicknesses (Mohammadi Gheidari et al 2007). The thicker film has a rough surface as shown in Figure 3 and as discussed by Jafari et al (2007) it has low transmission and electrical conductivity; this fact is well supported by the film's resistivity variation study (Barabasi and Stanley 1995). Taking these assumptions into consideration, the average transmissions (T ave ) in the visible region of the spectrum and the film's resistivity may be determined (Mohammadi Gheidari et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the films deposited at different sputtering gas pressures have different thicknesses (Mohammadi Gheidari et al 2007). The thicker film has a rough surface as shown in Figure 3 and as discussed by Jafari et al (2007) it has low transmission and electrical conductivity; this fact is well supported by the film's resistivity variation study (Barabasi and Stanley 1995). Taking these assumptions into consideration, the average transmissions (T ave ) in the visible region of the spectrum and the film's resistivity may be determined (Mohammadi Gheidari et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The relative intensity of the (222)/(400), interplaner distances, average optical surface resistivity and transmission of the films in various annealing temperatures are also summarized in Table I. The surface resistivity of the films takes its minimum value at 400 1C along with transmission enhancement, which is attributed to larger carrier mobility, film crystallite improvement and grain size enlargement at this temperature (Barabasi and Stanley 1995, Jafari et al 2003, Bashar 1997, Mohammadi Gheidari et al 2007, Hu et al 2004, Vassant Kumar and Mansingh 1989, Aggour et al 2000.…”
Section: Definition Of the Roughness Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The active surface is proportional to surface roughness parameters such as roughness exponent, standard deviation, and correlation length [35]. In this research, to analyze and compare the surface roughness of the deposited films, we measured the roughness of three random areas over the surface of the deposited sample and recorded the average and root mean square (rms) values of the measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an increasing interest for understanding the thin film growth (or material dissolution) mechanism and kinetics of surface roughness evolution. In order to perform a quantitative study on the complex behaviour of the samples' roughness, the roughness parameters and multi-fractality of different thin films have been calculated by several research groups [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Kinetic Rougheningmentioning
confidence: 99%