Ethical Community-Based Research With
                                                  Hispanic or Latina(o) Populations: Balancing
                                                  Research Rigor and Cultural Responsiveness

Castro, Felipe González; Rios, Rebeca; Montoya, Harry

doi:10.4135/9781412986168.n8

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Participatory research approaches such as CBPR are of particular interest in cross-cultural and multicultural research. According to González Castro et al (2006), culturally responsive research "refers to research designs and methodologies that adequately respect the local culture and effectively respond to critical cultural issues" (p. 139). A culturally responsive approach is essential to CBPR (Wallerstein et al 2019b).…”

Section: Culturally Responsive Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Inclusive and equitable research is an ethical imperative. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) as well as human-centered design are approaches that center partnership between community members and academic researchers. Together, academic-community research teams iteratively study community priorities, collaboratively develop ethical study designs, and co-create innovations that are accessible and meaningful to the community partners while advancing science. The foundation of the CBPR approach is reliant on its core principles of equity, colearning, shared power in decision-making, reciprocity, and mutual benefit. While the CBPR approach has been used extensively in public health and other areas of healthcare research, the approach is relatively new to audiology, otolaryngology, and hearing health research. The purpose of the present article is to advance an understanding of the CBPR approach, along with principles from human-centered design, in the context of research aimed to advance equity and access in hearing healthcare. Design: The literature is reviewed to provide an introduction for auditory scientists to the CBPR approach and human-centered design, including discussion of the underlying principles of CBPR and where it fits along a community-engaged continuum, theoretical and evaluation frameworks, as well as applications within auditory research. Results: Recent applications of CBPR have been framed broadly within the theoretical positions of the socioecological model for a systems-level approach to community-engaged research and the Health Services Utilization model within health services and disparities research using CBPR. Utilizing human-centered design strategies can work in tandem with a CBPR approach to engage a wide range of people in the research process and move toward the development of innovative yet feasible solutions. Conclusions: Leveraging the principles of CBPR is an intricate and dynamic process, may not be a fit for some topics, some researchers’ skillsets, and may be beyond some projects’ resources. When implemented skillfully and authentically, CBPR can be of benefit by elevating and empowering community voices and cultural perspectives historically marginalized in society and underrepresented within research. With a focus on health equity, this review of CBPR in the study of hearing healthcare emphasizes how this approach to research can help to advance inclusion, diversity, and access to innovation.

show abstract

Section: Culturally Responsive Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ethnocultural diversity in research is typically more a function of convenience than of intentionality. Recruitment of ethnoculturally diverse samples is not simply dictated by availability but also re-quires culturally competent outreach, direct involvement with communities, and demonstration that research will benefit the communities (Castro, Rios, & Montoya, 2006).…”

Section: Multicultural Psychology Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

On becoming multicultural in a monocultural research world: A conceptual approach to studying ethnocultural diversity.

Hall

Yip

Zárate

2016

American Psychologist

155

156

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Race, culture, and ethnicity are critical components of the human experience, yet they are often treated as nuisance variables or as post hoc explanations for poorly predicted results. Mandates to pay attention to ethnocultural diversity in research have largely been ignored. Here, we affirm some basic principles of multicultural psychology in conceptually grounded research. We first identify the importance of clear and conceptually guided ethnocultural research, and describe multiple perspectives in the field. The first perspective, a generalizability approach, seeks to find similarities and universalities across diverse groups. The second perspective, a group differences approach, attempts to determine the generalizability and limits to generalizability across different groups that are assumed to represent different cultures. The third perspective, multicultural psychology, involves specifying and measuring the mechanisms of cultural influences on behavior in ethnocultural groups underrepresented in research. In contrast to conventional approaches to culture that apply existing models to other groups, we propose an "inside-out" model that prizes the perspectives of those in ethnocultural communities that are underrepresented in research and places a secondary emphasis on generalizability. We follow with examples and new directions for multicultural psychology research. This approach has the potential to enhance researchers' ability to answer conceptually derived research questions and in combination with the other approaches promises to enhance the advancement of psychological science generally. (PsycINFO Database Record

show abstract

“…This standard can be achieved by requiring the use of a community advisoty board (CAB). The purposes of such CABs are to protect against BEST PRACTICES FOR RESPONDING TO THREATS OF VIOLENCE exploitation of vulnerable populations, to ensure fair terms of cooperation, to ratify that the methods to be used are acceptable to community members, and to minimize potential misunderstandings about the nature of the research (Castro, Rios, & Montoya, 2006;Mohatt & Thomas, 2006;Noe et al, 2006). These CABs should have responsibility for determining whether the research goals are valuable to the population of interest and the methods acceptable before the research is allowed to proceed.…”

Section: Community Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Best practices for responding to threats of violence in research ethically and legally.

Buchanan¹,

Gable²,

Fisher³

2009

Research With High-Risk Populations: Balancing Science, Ethics, and Law.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ethical Community-Based Research With Hispanic or Latina(o) Populations: Balancing Research Rigor and Cultural Responsiveness

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity

Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity

On becoming multicultural in a monocultural research world: A conceptual approach to studying ethnocultural diversity.

Best practices for responding to threats of violence in research ethically and legally.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About