Ethical Considerations in Ending Exploratory Brain–Computer Interface Research Studies in Locked-in Syndrome

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a promising technology for restoring communication in individuals with locked-in syndrome (LIS). BCI technology offers a potential tool for individuals with impaired or absent means of effective communication to use brain activity to control an output device such as a computer keyboard. Exploratory studies of BCI devices for communication in people with LIS are underway. Research with individuals with LIS presents not only technological challenges, but ethical challenges as well. Whereas recent attention has been focused on ethical issues that arise at the initiation of studies, such as how to obtain valid consent, relatively little attention has been given to issues at the conclusion of studies. BCI research in LIS highlights one such challenge: How to decide when an exploratory BCI research study should end. In this article, we present the case of an individual with presumed LIS enrolled in an exploratory BCI study. We consider whether two common ethical frameworks for stopping randomized clinical trials-equipoise and nonexploitation-can be usefully applied to elucidating researcher obligations to end exploratory BCI research. We argue that neither framework is a good fit for exploratory BCI research. Instead, we apply recent work on clinician-researcher fiduciary obligations and in turn offer some preliminary recommendations for BCI researchers on how to end exploratory BCI studies.

Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations

“… 101 , 102 Obtaining assent from children with severe neurologic disabilities is complicated by communication limitations. 103 , 104 Nevertheless, obtaining exclusive parental substitute consent without seeking explicit assent by the child should not be considered sufficient for this type of intervention. Intracortical motor brain-computer interface calibration requires regular training sessions spanning over months—each requiring a high level of concentration and motivation.…”

Neuroscience of consciousness in the locked‐in syndrome: Prognostic and diagnostic review

“…Quadriplegia is the inability to move or utilize any of one's limbs. Paralyzed individuals might be able to connect with others via the use of coded signals because eye blinking and movement are rarely impaired by paralysis 12 . There is a chance that some individuals may recover mobility in their extraocular muscles as well as their facial muscles 13 .…”

“…Paralyzed individuals might be able to connect with others via the use of coded signals because eye blinking and movement are rarely impaired by paralysis. 12 There is a chance that some individuals may recover mobility in their extraocular muscles as well as their facial muscles. 13 However they are unable to create sounds at their own will, regardless of whether or not their vocal cords are paralyzed.…”

An Introductory Tutorial on Brain–Computer Interfaces and Their Applications

“…Brain-computer interfacing research poses ethical and legal issues related to the question of mind-reading as well as mind-conditioning. BCI research and its translation to therapeutic intervention gave rise to significant ethical, legal, and social concerns, especially about person-hood, stigma, autonomy, privacy, safety, responsibility, and justice [110,111]. Talks of "brain hacking" and "brain phishing" triggered a debate among ethicists, security experts, and policymakers to prepare for a world of BCI products and services by predicting implications of BCI to liberty and autonomy.…”