2014
DOI: 10.1177/1473325014556793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical issues and dilemmas in doing research with itinerant street vending children and young people: Experiences from Nigeria

Abstract: It has been widely acknowledged in recent years that contemporary ideas about children and childhoods are framed by perceptions and definitions that are both Western/ minority world and adult-centred. This paper argues that this is not only the case for theoretical concepts but is also found in research practice, and, in particular, in the commonly accepted ethical frameworks for conducting research with children and young people. Drawing from multi-sited fieldwork and a combined ethnographic methodology of pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first of these related to the challenge of building equal partnerships in the context of power differences between developed countries that finance research, and LMIC where the 'problems' to be solved are considered to exist (Coleman et al 2015;Gogognon and Godard 2015;Hunt, Gogognon, and Ridde 2014). The remaining two areas of concern related to positionality and possible role conflicts of the research team (objectivity of researchers) (Kiragu and Warrington 2013;Nuwagaba and Rule 2015;Pyles 2015), and risks for the research team (from physical riskfor example in war zones; to emotional burnout working with vulnerable population) (Chiumento et al 2016;Okoli 2015). Across these three areas, ethical dilemmas related to how the researchers' cultural / value biases potentially affect the way they approach the research and research participants; how to reconcile the role of (and in some research, the requirement for) the impartial objective researcher with a research context, and a research participant group experiencing vital need; and a concern with health and wellbeing of the research team in contexts of political instability, extreme deprivation, and potentially traumatising situations.…”
Section: Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these related to the challenge of building equal partnerships in the context of power differences between developed countries that finance research, and LMIC where the 'problems' to be solved are considered to exist (Coleman et al 2015;Gogognon and Godard 2015;Hunt, Gogognon, and Ridde 2014). The remaining two areas of concern related to positionality and possible role conflicts of the research team (objectivity of researchers) (Kiragu and Warrington 2013;Nuwagaba and Rule 2015;Pyles 2015), and risks for the research team (from physical riskfor example in war zones; to emotional burnout working with vulnerable population) (Chiumento et al 2016;Okoli 2015). Across these three areas, ethical dilemmas related to how the researchers' cultural / value biases potentially affect the way they approach the research and research participants; how to reconcile the role of (and in some research, the requirement for) the impartial objective researcher with a research context, and a research participant group experiencing vital need; and a concern with health and wellbeing of the research team in contexts of political instability, extreme deprivation, and potentially traumatising situations.…”
Section: Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%