“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”

Ford, Gary G.

doi:10.4324/9781482274400-4

Cited by 1,123 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Two researchers designed the coding framework based on the typology of social support used in NSSQ, i.e., affective support, affirmative support, and aid [31]. Among other typologies of social support, we chose it for consistency with the questionnaire.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We collected quantitative data such as the type of peer support, level of perceived support, and name of support providers based on the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire (NSSQ) [31], which is one of the most recognized tools for assessing social-support relationships according to the systematic literature review (Figure 1). NSSQ was developed by Norbeck and colleagues to measure the perceived strength of social support.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Relational Approach to the Design for Peer Support

Pahk

Baek

2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer-support services enhance mental wellbeing and increase the knowledge and capabilities of self-help groups in various settings. To ensure that these services foster peer-support relationships as intended, it is necessary to design and assess them from a relational perspective. This study presents a relational framework for peer-support design and its application to two existing peer-support services for solitary seniors in Seoul and Ulsan. The framework aims to support the analysis and conception of peer-support services. It incorporates network analysis and codesigning to understand multi-faceted peer-support relationships and to develop strategies for creating relational values, respectively. Case studies used observation and interviews to understand the multi-faceted issue of social support. Relational data for fourteen solitary seniors were collected and analyzed in terms of the qualities, quantities, and structure of peer-support relationships. Analysis results demonstrate an increased level of perceived peer support through relationship forming, as well as the factors that suppress peer-support building such as network fragmentation and the discrepancy of needs. Analysis results were fed into codesigning interventions with stakeholders. Based on these findings, we discuss the preconditions for building peer-support relationships and outline the relational approach to the design for peer support in a wider context.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%