2006
DOI: 10.2979/hyp.2006.21.1.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and Ideology in Breastfeeding Advocacy Campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences in feeding intentionality were found between those exposed to the risk language text and those exposed to the benefits language text. The overall finding that exposure to breastfeeding advocacy information of any kind did not significantly change feeding intent is consistent with Kukla's argument that we have reached a threshold effect regarding breastfeeding advocacy; with the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the superiority of breastfeeding and breast milk at an all-time high, the impact that additional straightforward information will make in changed intent and behavior is negligible (Kukla, 2006). This is one interpretation of findings that, despite major dissemination of information regarding the benefits of breastfeeding to mother and child, feeding behaviors have not changed significantly in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…No significant differences in feeding intentionality were found between those exposed to the risk language text and those exposed to the benefits language text. The overall finding that exposure to breastfeeding advocacy information of any kind did not significantly change feeding intent is consistent with Kukla's argument that we have reached a threshold effect regarding breastfeeding advocacy; with the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the superiority of breastfeeding and breast milk at an all-time high, the impact that additional straightforward information will make in changed intent and behavior is negligible (Kukla, 2006). This is one interpretation of findings that, despite major dissemination of information regarding the benefits of breastfeeding to mother and child, feeding behaviors have not changed significantly in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is an increasing recognition that even when mothers know "breast is best," however, they may stop breastfeeding because of the social environment in which breastfeeding occurs (Kukla, 2006;Morrison, Rez, Cardines, Foutch-Chew, & Severance, 2008). The social context for breastfeeding in the United States is marked by enthusiastic support alongside persistent resistance (Wolf, 2007).…”
Section: Breastfeeding In the Usamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is substantial evidence that being perceived as a good mother is a central identity issue for many mothers (Collett, 2005). Breastfeeding is integral to the development of maternal identity and being known as a "good" mother (Kukla, 2006;Murphy, 1999). To the extent that breastfeeding occurs in partnership with a child, maternal identity and its management is dependent upon not only maternal behaviors but also the dyadic performance of mothering "with" the child.…”
Section: Dilemmas Of the Dyadic Encountermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Starting in the 1990s, public health campaigns have begun to tout breast milk as "liquid gold," vital for the health, intelligence, and emotional well-being of infants (see policy statements and calls for action of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 1997Pediatrics, , 2005; the Department of Health's 2000 Blueprint for Action on Breastfeeding; WHO, 2002 Global Strategy on Infant Feeding; for analyses of these campaigns sees Kukla, 2006). These campaigns promote breast-feeding as a natural, medically informed, rational, and responsible parenting choice.…”
Section: The Breast-feeding Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%