2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics, Ideology, and Reproductive Health Policy in the United States

Abstract: The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo recognized the centrality of reproductive health to human rights and development. Progress on the Cairo agenda has slowed for numerous reasons, however. The United States, once an enthusiastic promoter of this agenda and still the world's leading reproductive health donor, has revised its reproductive health policies radically since the 2000 presidential election of George W. Bush. This study examines how policies have been reconfigu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hope that our research and ongoing projects assist HIV-positive individuals, policy makers and healthcare providers globally to develop their programs for safer, supportive pregnancy planning for HIV-positive individuals in their communities. Although much research has been started on a global level in the area of safer pregnancy planning, fertility, pregnancy, and parenting [49]–[56], significantly more is needed to support HIV-positive individuals to have healthy pregnancies and families. Finally, similar research should be carried out with HIV-positive male populations, which is being planned by our research team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope that our research and ongoing projects assist HIV-positive individuals, policy makers and healthcare providers globally to develop their programs for safer, supportive pregnancy planning for HIV-positive individuals in their communities. Although much research has been started on a global level in the area of safer pregnancy planning, fertility, pregnancy, and parenting [49]–[56], significantly more is needed to support HIV-positive individuals to have healthy pregnancies and families. Finally, similar research should be carried out with HIV-positive male populations, which is being planned by our research team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promotion of inaccurate information about abortion has been identified in abstinence-only education (AOE) programmes (Ott and Santelli 2007) and Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) (Bryant and Levi 2012;Rosen 2012), both of which tend to exaggerate the health risks of abortion, specifically depression, breast cancer and infertility (Russo and Denious 2005;Kulczycki 2007;Mauro and Joffe 2007). 4 Of the 17 states requiring AOE programmes, just over half (53%) were 'red' states (Stanger-Hall, Hall, and Vitzthum 2011), while the majority of the 25 states that rejected federal funding for AOE were 'blue' states, as of 2009 (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States 2011).…”
Section: Differences In State Abortion Laws and Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although limited thus far, such linkages are starting to be developed in several international organizations and countries, including Canada [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. HIV status at the time of the last pregnancy, ethnic background, marital status and number of lifetime births were the variables retained in the multivariable model, as the two former covariates were the a priori covariates of interest and the latter two were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%