Ethics in intensive care medicine

Abstract

In more than 30 years of development of intensive care medicine (ICM), our specialty has acquired moral and ethical standpoints, although not without public pressure and discussions. Special commissions dealing, e.g., with brain death, terminal care, ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatment in the critically ill, withholding or withdrawing mechanical ventilation, and other issues have been formed in a number of medical societies. International consensus conferences have helped to clarify some of the issues. With increasing experience, a multitude of ethical problems have arisen in ICM that have to be dealt with, such as the issue of quality of life. What is an unworthy life? Are we allowed to make judgments for our patients? What is cost-effectiveness in ICM? Other restrictions include bed and equipment shortages in the intensive care unit (ICU), the necessity for triage--undisputed in catastrophe medicine--and how one should proceed in managing elective patients? In situations of limited ICU bed availability, sicker patients will be admitted, sparing out patients who are less ill for observation and those with poor quality of life and poor prognosis. For the future, it will likely be necessary to define the patients who should be admitted to an ICU more than those who should not be admitted. An ICU treatment entitlement index would be directly proportional to the probability of successful outcome and the quality of the remaining life, and would be inversely related to costs for achieving success. The ICU outcome with survival, hospital mortality, and follow-up of ICU patients is considered. DNR (do not resuscitate), the dying patient, terminal care, terminal weaning--DNT (do not treat)--active and passive euthanasia, living wills, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness for ICU patients are defined. Their application in the ICU will be discussed and problems pointed out. Outcome predictions using scores (APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM) have been developed based on previous experience, but should only be applied to patient groups and for quality assurance in ICUs. The most frequent and difficult problem in the ICUs is the vegetative state, which requires an exact diagnosis. The differential diagnosis from other comatose states such as coma, brain death, and locked-in-syndrome is depicted. The ethics of interrupting life-sustaining treatment in critically ill patients have been worked out by a Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (1990). A consensus was found that the patient may judge to forego therapy; ethically it is then appropriate to withhold or withdraw therapy. According to the consensus, withdrawing an already initiated treatment should not necessarily be regarded as more problematic than a decision not to initiate treatment. In my mind, however, there is a great difference between withdrawing or withholding, e.g., ventilation. A dissentive opinion by some members of the Task Force stated that hydration and nutrition other than high-technology or parenteral nutrition are key compon...

Managing a Suicidal or Gravely Disabled Patient on an Involuntary Psychiatric Hold and Who Has End-ofLife Orders: Key Factors to Consider in an Emergency Room Setting

“…The timing of such decisions includes the prehospital setting (outpatient, nursing home, palliative care, etc.) [136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147], at the time of arrival to the emergency room, upon hospital admission [148,149], during hospitalization [150][151][152][153], operating room [154][155][156], intensive care unit [157][158][159][160], or day of death [161]. One study of intentional ivermectin pesticide ingestion found that three patients developed respiratory failure but were not intubated because of a DNR order [162].…”

Ética do uso de escores prognósticos em unidade de terapia intensiva: revisão integrativa

“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422022302535PT Ética do uso de escores prognósticos em unidade de terapia intensiva: revisão integrativa Quadro 3. Artigos que questionam o modelo de alocação de recursos baseado nos escores prognósticos Dos artigos classificados nessa categoria, apenas três discutem as implicações éticas relacionadas às escolhas médicas, que não seriam somente técnicas, mas também morais [53][54][55][56] . Os artigos dessa categoria classificam alguns dos escores prognósticos como injustos, como por exemplo: a possibilidade de o médico admitir apenas pacientes que tenham enfermidades que se relacionem com sua especialidade, bem como a idade dos pacientesindicador comum entre os escores, tal como o utilizado pelo Apache.…”

Ethics in the use of prognostic scores in intensive care units: an integrative review

“…Shows that, despite the prognostic scores, triage for ICU admission is based on another order of priorities, according to which the number of available beds is more significant "End-of-life decisions in Greek intensive care units: a multicenter cohort study" Ethics in the use of prognostic scores in intensive care units: an integrative review Title Year Main characteristic "Ten common questions (and their answers) on medical futility" 58 2014 Regarding prognostic scores, it understands that there is no way to accurately determine the days of life of a patient and that such rigid data cannot be predictive of choice to continue or start important medical care "Predicting the future-big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine" Of the articles classified in this category, only three discuss the ethical implications related to medical choices, considered not only technical but also moral [53][54][55][56] . These studies classify some of the prognostic scores as unfair, such as: the physicians' possibility to admit only patients who have diseases related to their specialty, as well as the age of the patients-a common indicator among scores, such as APACHE.…”