2012
DOI: 10.4135/9781473957619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
154
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
154
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We must recognize too, of course, that some practical values should operate as ethical constraints on how research is carried out, see Hammersley and Traianou 2012. Even so, his position is different from emotivism, which treats value judgments as expressions of attitude rather than as propositional statements, so that argument is restricted to the factual assumptions they involve (Ayer 1936: 110), and from most kinds of subjectivism, where value judgments are statements about individual preferences (see Frondizi 1971: ch 3). For further discussion of these common criticisms of Weber's position, see Hammersley 2014a: ch 3.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must recognize too, of course, that some practical values should operate as ethical constraints on how research is carried out, see Hammersley and Traianou 2012. Even so, his position is different from emotivism, which treats value judgments as expressions of attitude rather than as propositional statements, so that argument is restricted to the factual assumptions they involve (Ayer 1936: 110), and from most kinds of subjectivism, where value judgments are statements about individual preferences (see Frondizi 1971: ch 3). For further discussion of these common criticisms of Weber's position, see Hammersley 2014a: ch 3.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic tradition has tended to rely on the concept of universalised rational subject and liberal humanism of individualistic perspectives which places the duty upon individuals to be ethical (Halse and Honey 2010;Hammersley and Traianou 2012;Brooks et al 2014). Other traditions, including Christianity and Islam, have been part of this historical development in influencing principles and practices of ethics.…”
Section: Sources Of Ethical Thinking and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as our technologies have arguably changed the instrumentation of human action, renewed discussion is certainly required. Indeed, there is a sizeable body of literature dealing with the methodology of conducting online and technology mediated research and its associated ethics issues (e.g., Beaulieu & Estalella, 2012;Hammersley & Traianou, 2012;Nind, Wiles, Bengry-Howell, & Crow, 2012;Whiteman, 2010;Zimmer, 2010), however a much smaller body of work deals with the peculiar concerns of ethical research practices, decisions and dilemmas involved in using digital technologies in education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%