Ethics in Radiology: Wait Lists Queue Jumping

Cunningham, Natalie; Reid, Lynette; MacSwain, Sarah; Clarke, J

doi:10.1016/j.carj.2011.12.006

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each case study presents an ethical challenge based on actual situations that have happened in Canadian radiology practices, and includes an ethical analysis, as well as a set of questions developed by the bioethicist to stimulate thoughtful discussion. The case used in this study has been published 6 and is available for others to use in their own contexts.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics in radiology: A case-based approach

Stiles-Clarke¹,

Clarke²

2018

Can. Med. Ed. J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ethics training is required for all radiology residents in Canada, but this may be difficult to provide as radiology departments may not have radiologists with formal ethics training, and may not have access to educational resources focussed on teaching ethics to radiologists. We describe the implementation of a case-based approach to teaching and learning ethics, designed for Canadian radiologists. This approach can be adapted for use in other specialties through development of specialty-specific ethics case scenarios.Methods: Ethics case study rounds specific to Canadian radiologic practice were presented at two different institutions, and using two different methods within one institution. In one method, we requested that the residents read the case study and questions ahead of time; in the other, the rounds were presented without any expectation of residents doing prior preparation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics in radiology: A case-based approach

Stiles-Clarke¹,

Clarke²

2018

Can. Med. Ed. J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cunningham and colleagues raise several conundrums for care providers asked to help their personal acquaintances jump the queue, but their conclusion is a vague declaration that physicians “must constantly balance and reevaluate [their] ethical and legal responsibility to [their] patients and society, and participate in the pursuit of better systems to provide and prioritize care” (Cunningham et al. 2013, 175).…”

Section: Examples Of Queue‐jumping Argumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Queue‐jumping arguments

Aberdein,

Pike

2024

Metaphilosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A queue‐jumping argument concludes that some course of action is impermissible by likening it to the presumptively impermissible act of jumping a queue. Arguments of this sort may be found in a disparate range of contexts and in support of policies favoured by both left and right. Examples include arguments against private education and private health care but also arguments against accommodations for learning disabilities, refugee resettlement, and birthright citizenship. We infer that, although queue‐jumping arguments are strictly analogies, they constitute a sufficiently distinct class of arguments to justify their separate treatment. The paper proposes an argumentation scheme for queue‐jumping arguments and demonstrates its applicability to some existing arguments of this type.

show abstract

Introduction to the Special Issue: Precarious Solidarity—Preferential Access in Canadian Health Care

Reid

2017

Health Care Anal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systems of universal health coverage may aspire to provide care based on need and not ability to pay; the complexities of this aspiration (conceptual, practical, and ethical) call for normative analysis. This special issue arises in the wake of a judicial inquiry into preferential access in the Canadian province of Alberta, the Vertes Commission. I describe this inquiry and set out a taxonomy of forms of differential and preferential access. Papers in this special issue focus on the conceptual specification of health system boundaries (the concept of medical need) and on the normative questions raised by complex models of funding and delivery of care, where patients, providers, and services cross system boundaries.

show abstract

Ethics in Radiology: Wait Lists Queue Jumping

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Ethics in radiology: A case-based approach

Ethics in radiology: A case-based approach

Queue‐jumping arguments

Introduction to the Special Issue: Precarious Solidarity—Preferential Access in Canadian Health Care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About