2006
DOI: 10.1080/08900523.2006.9679733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics of Care: More Than Just Another Tool to Bash the Media?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students trained in ‘emotional literacy’ are encouraged to write from the victim’s perspective, empower survivors, allow survivors to have a voice in the story, and focus energy on offender prosecution. Operating from a care perspective, journalists can ensure that traumatized individuals are both informed and treated in a beneficial manner (Vanacker and Breslin, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students trained in ‘emotional literacy’ are encouraged to write from the victim’s perspective, empower survivors, allow survivors to have a voice in the story, and focus energy on offender prosecution. Operating from a care perspective, journalists can ensure that traumatized individuals are both informed and treated in a beneficial manner (Vanacker and Breslin, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the ethics of consequences, the ethics of duty holds that behavior is judged as being right or wrong on the basis of external values rather than on utility. The communitarian ethics of care rejects the notion that individual decision making is independent from social context (Vanacker & Breslin, 2006).…”
Section: Ethical Approaches To Lifestyles Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consideration of this unequal relationship, Noddings (1984) stresses the fundamental importance of dialogue in formulating goals that are mutually agreed upon by both the caregiver and care receiver. The caregiver “does not capitalise or use this power to impose her or his decisions on the ‘weaker’ party” (Vanacker and Breslin, 2006, p. 201). Dialogue between caregiver and care receiver could enable the caregiver to determine what is in the best interest of the receiver and could address the potentially paternalistic relationship that caring based solely on good intentions could engender (Vanacker and Breslin, 2006).…”
Section: Beneficiary Engagement Through Care Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%