2011
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue differences between Turkish and North American adults by comparing two sample populations with ideal occlusion and well-balanced faces. Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 117 Anatolian Turkish adults (65 female and 52 male, mean age: 23.9 ± 2.8 years) were compared with a sample of 116 adults of European-American ancestry (64 female and 52 male, mean age: 25.0 ± 6.8 years). The cephalometric analyses of Holdaway, Epker, and Legan and Burstone were performed u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
49
2
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
49
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the soft tissue paradigm, more importance has been given to the soft tissue during diagnosis and treatment planning (Uysal et al, 2012). Soft tissue varies significantly with the difference in mandibular divergence pattern (Scheideman et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the soft tissue paradigm, more importance has been given to the soft tissue during diagnosis and treatment planning (Uysal et al, 2012). Soft tissue varies significantly with the difference in mandibular divergence pattern (Scheideman et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] However, as far as we know, this is the first study to analysis the craniofacial ethnic difference by using the method of creating a Bolton template and using superimposition. Superimposition supports the cephalometric measurement comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The Bolton standards are white in derivation, so obviously, it may not be appropriate to apply them to patients of other ethnic origins. Theoretically, it would be easier to distinguish craniofacial differences between two ethnic groups by superimposing the two standard templates at a certain age than by comparing the values of various linear and angular measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Turkish population displayed lengths of 15.3 ± 3.4 mm in males and 15.3 ±2.8 mm in females. 23 Persian males had a length of 18.91 ± 2.97 and 14.91 ± 2.90 mm. 24 The values obtained from our study for males (15 + 4.8 mm) were in the normal range as described by Holdaway (14-24 mm), 25 while the females nasal length obtained was less than the normal value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%