“…For example, studies included samples that represented the West (e.g., Hernández et al, ; Liu & Lau, ), Southwest (e.g., Ayón, Ojeda, & Ruano, ; Derlan, Umaña‐Taylor, Updegraff, & Jahromi, ), Midwest (e.g., Paasch‐Anderson & Lamborn, ; Yoon et al, ), Northeast (e.g., Calzada, Huang, Anicama, Fernandez, & Brotman, ; Peck, Brodish, Malanchuk, Banerjee, & Eccles, ), and the Southeast (e.g., Edwards & Few‐Demo, ; Kulish et al, ). Furthermore, several studies included participants from all regions of the United States by relying on internet‐based sampling (e.g., Juang, Shen, Kim, & Wang, ; Mohanty, ) or extant nationally representative secondary data sources (e.g., Banerjee et al, ; Csizmadia, Rollins, & Kaneakua, ). Diversity with respect to geographic representation of samples is essential when studying issues of race and ethnicity given the complex and diverse history of marginalization experienced by different groups in different regions of the United States (e.g., Dowling & Newby, ; Fox, ).…”