2003
DOI: 10.1037/1099-9809.9.3.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic self-awareness as a function of ethnic group status, group composition, and ethnic identity orientation.

Abstract: This study found that ethnic self-awareness (i.e., the extent to which people are consciously aware of their ethnicity at any given moment) has different meanings for European Americans and Asian Americans and for Asian Americans with different ethnic identity orientations. The authors found main effects of ethnic group status and ethnic composition on ethnic self-awareness when comparing Asian Americans and European Americans. There was also an interaction effect between ethnic composition and ethnic identity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that negatively portrayed collective identity dominates individuals' identity. Many studies (Farver, Xu, Bhadha, Narang, & Liebar, 2007;Khan & Lambert, 2001;Kim-ju & Liem, 2003) show that ethnic minorities felt better about themselves when their ethnic group was 5 positively reflected by the majority. Conversely, it would be easier for ethnic minorities to maintain a strong self-ethnic identity when their collective identity is viewed favorably by the majority.…”
Section: Identity Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that negatively portrayed collective identity dominates individuals' identity. Many studies (Farver, Xu, Bhadha, Narang, & Liebar, 2007;Khan & Lambert, 2001;Kim-ju & Liem, 2003) show that ethnic minorities felt better about themselves when their ethnic group was 5 positively reflected by the majority. Conversely, it would be easier for ethnic minorities to maintain a strong self-ethnic identity when their collective identity is viewed favorably by the majority.…”
Section: Identity Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that majority and minority members leave cross-group interactions with different perceptions of similarity. For majority members, their ethnic identity may be less salient (Kim-ju & Liem, 2003;Mullen, 1991) or they may perceive more overlap between their ethnic group and the superordinate group (Devos & Banaji, 2005;Mummenday & Wenzel, 1999). Such perceptions would make it easier for majority group members to see themselves as similar to their cross-group interaction partners.…”
Section: Differing Perspectives Of Majority and Minority Membersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Gurin, Peng, Lopez, and Nagda (1999) attribute this difference to power relationships, where the dominating group ignores other groups, and historically European Americans have been the dominant group. As a result, Americans are less inclined to reflect on their group status and membership (Kim-Ju & Liem, 2003;Leach, Snider, & Lyer, 2002). For Arabs, the salience of Arab ethnicity would be stronger in the United States, considering the growing prejudice toward Arabs in the United States (Barry, Elliot, & Evans, 2000).…”
Section: Ethnic Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%