2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EU and US control measures on Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in certain ready-to-eat meat products: An equivalence study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The European Union regulation applies a risk‐based approach of a 100 CFU/g limit for L. monocytogenes in RTE products and requiring FBO to demonstrate with science‐based evidence that this limit will be respected throughout the shelf life (European Commission, 2005). Therefore, if L. monocytogenes is detected on a food contact surface, different corrective actions are required in Europe and the United States (Neri et al., 2019). In Europe, no action is required by law, but in the interests of public health, the food produced in the contaminated line, if still in the immediate control of the FBO, should be put on hold and tested for the presence of L. monocytogenes .…”
Section: Corrective Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Union regulation applies a risk‐based approach of a 100 CFU/g limit for L. monocytogenes in RTE products and requiring FBO to demonstrate with science‐based evidence that this limit will be respected throughout the shelf life (European Commission, 2005). Therefore, if L. monocytogenes is detected on a food contact surface, different corrective actions are required in Europe and the United States (Neri et al., 2019). In Europe, no action is required by law, but in the interests of public health, the food produced in the contaminated line, if still in the immediate control of the FBO, should be put on hold and tested for the presence of L. monocytogenes .…”
Section: Corrective Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lettuce and pork were chosen because they represent two different food matrices. Compared with lettuce, the complex nature and conditions of pork such as water activity, nutrients, pH will affect the survival status of the target bacteria it carries, and thus affect the culture effect of SSEL (Duffy, Vanderlinde, & Grau, 1994; Neri et al, 2019; Plavsic, Okanovic, Gubic, & Njezic, 2015; Tango et al, 2018). In cold‐stressed situation, lettuce could not keep bacterial cells in normal form due to the lack of nutrition, and it took a long time for the stressed cells to recover (Huang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ready-to-eat (RTE) foods and meats pose serious problems even with a minimum presence of the pathogen. For this reason, US safety agencies adopt different methods than EU and zero tolerance for L. monocytogenes in RTE products [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDA regulation for L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods imposes strict limits and corrective solutions for contaminated food. In particular the limits correspond to 0.04 CFU of L. monocytogenes per gram of food that supports the growth of L. monocytogenes, while in foods that do not support the growth of the microorganism the limits is extended to 100 CFU/g [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%