EU Private Law and the CISG

Slakoper, Zvonimir; Tot, Ivan

doi:10.4324/9781003080602

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Iz navedene zakonske odredbe iščitavamo o tome koji su oblici krivnje -to su namjera (dolus) i nepažnja (culpa). 49 Razlikovanje subjektivnog i objektivnog elementa protupravnosti važno je u određenju različitih vrsta odgovornosti za štetu -subjektivne (odgovornost po osnovi krivnje) i objektivne ili kauzalne odgovornosti (odgovornost bez obzira na krivnju). Tako se kod šteta za koje se odgovara po principu subjektivne odgovornosti, pored svih prethodno navedenih pretpostavki za postojanje odštetne odgovornosti, zahtijeva i krivnja štetnika, dok se kod objektivne odgovornosti za štetu odgovara bez obzira na krivnju štetnika (dakle -kad i krivnje nema, za odgovornost je dovoljna povreda pravila pravnog poretka).…”

Section: Protupravnostunclassified

“…Po uobičajenom obrascu, slijedili bi zakoni, podzakonski akti, pravni običaji, pravna znanost i sudska praksa. 52 Tako je najviše pravo vrelo za odštetnu odgovornost u sportu (ali i za bilo koje drugo pitanje) Ustav Republike Hrvatske 53 kao najviši pravni akt 49 Pritom je namjera najteži oblik krivnje, kod kojeg štetnik postupa znajući i hotimice -on želi i štetnu radnju kao uzrok i štetu kao posljedicu te štetne radnje. S druge strane, štetnik koji postupa s nepažnjom ne želi štetu kao posljedicu, već želi samo štetnu radnju.…”

Section: Pravna Vrela Sportskog (Odštetnog) Prava U Republici Hrvatskojunclassified

“…", u: Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, Split, god. 49 (2) Kad dužnik ne ispuni obvezu ili zakasni s njezinim ispunjenjem, vjerovnik ima pravo zahtijevati i popravljanje štete koju je zbog toga pretrpio.…”

Section: Ugovorna Odgovornost Za šTete U Sportuunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Odštetna odgovornost u sportu (hrvatsko pozitivno pravo)

Kačer

Ostojić

Bogović

2022

Zb. rad. Prav. fak. Splitu (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Razvojem sporta, a ujedno i sportskog prava, odštetna odgovornost postaje njegov sve značajniji dio. Posljedica je to rastućih sportskih ambicija i pomicanja fizičkih granica u sportu, koje za sudionike rezultiraju i većim rizikom od ozljeda, ali ujedno i sve potpunije i detaljnije pravne regulacije u sportu – koja onda rezultira i odgovornošću svakog onog koji ta pravila povrijedi. Autorice su u radu predstavile pravni okvir odštetne odgovornosti kao izuzetno važnog dijela sportskog prava u Republici Hrvatskoj.

show abstract

Section: Protupravnostunclassified

Section: Pravna Vrela Sportskog (Odštetnog) Prava U Republici Hrvatskojunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Odštetna odgovornost u sportu (hrvatsko pozitivno pravo)

Kačer

Ostojić

Bogović

2022

Zb. rad. Prav. fak. Splitu (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Whereas in the former federal law, as in the effective SrbLO, the party prejudiced by the supervening events may lodge a claim only for the repudiation of the contract, whereby the parties may agree to modify it in the course of the proceedings; under the HrvLO, the aggrieved party's claim may initially be oriented to modification of the contract. 171 He or she can make a disposition in the claim as to whether a modification or repudiation of the contract will be requested from the court. 172 Therefore, revision of the contract has primacy over its repudiation.…”

Section: Judicial Modification Of Contracts Due To Changed Circumstancesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in Circumstances: Frustrated Contracts and Legislative or Judicial Modification of the Contract

Veress¹,

Hulmák²,

Balliu³

et al. 2022

Contract Law in East Central Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Just as in Serbia, this legal lacuna had been filled by relying on the 'old legal rules' doctrine. However, in contrast to Serbia, the Croatian courts applied the rules of the Austrian Civil Code from 1811 ( §938-956), 77 which was in force in Croatia from 1853 until the Second World War. 78 By the adoption of the HrvLO in 2005, the need for applying the Austrian Civil Code by relying on the 'old legal rules' doctrine eventually disappeared, since the new HrvLO explicitly regulated the donation contract.…”

Section: Croatiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Gratuitous Contracts

Stec¹,

Hulmák²,

Balliu³

et al. 2022

Contract Law in East Central Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delimitation from other bilateral juridical actsAnother problem connected with gratuitous contracts is their delimitation from other juridical acts. Let us start with the simplest case: gratuitous contracts and precarium. In older literature, precarium was defined as a relationship where the client (precario accipens) could ask the patron (precario dans) to let him use that patron's chattel. The precario dans could request the return of said chattel at any time-this differentiated precarium from commodatum (a gratuitous loan for use). Later precarium was defined as a gratuitous relationship arising from the rules of politeness or hospitality. For instance, whenever we are guests at somebody's house, we use our host's furniture, silverware, and sometimes even a room and bed with no overt contractual formality for this. The relationship is therefore purely factual, and in many cases the accipens is not protected by law. Some systems maintain precarium as part of their civil law. Others have abolished it and, at best, allow the use of the commodatum rules by analogy. The limits between precarium and gratuitous contracts remain somewhat blurred, and the legal nature of a relationship has to be determined in each case separately.Gratuitous contracts, as mentioned above, are characterized by a lack of consideration or any reciprocal treatment. However, in many cases that seem prima facie gratuitous, there is some kind of 'payment,' either directly or indirectly. This does not mean exactly that the contract stops being gratuitous, but rather that we have to decide if such 'payment' constitutes a consideration or reciprocal treatment. The most basic case is donatio sub modo-a donation where the donator obliges the donee to act in a specific way without making anyone a creditor. This does not make the donatio sub modo an imperfect obligation. It is the donator and sometimes a public authority who can demand that the donee act as stipulated in the donation contract. In this case there is no creditor-debtor relationship, but there is a way to force the donee to act as specified in the contract. Generally, the courts will be inclined to use the sub modo clause to assess various donations with additional burdens placed on the other party.On the other hand, in some cases it is doubtful whether we really have a gratuitous contract and not some kind of a commercial relationship. For instance, we have no doubts that if, say, MOL, Orlen, or Shell give money to a sports association in exchange for displaying their logo, or change the name of the football stadium to 'ORLEN ARENA,' it is not a donation but a sponsorship contract. Let us now change the setting and assume that a large corporation funds a chair at a university (say, the 'BigBusinessInc Chair of Maritime Studies') or gives a large sum of money to the same

show abstract

EU Private Law and the CISG

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Odštetna odgovornost u sportu (hrvatsko pozitivno pravo)

Odštetna odgovornost u sportu (hrvatsko pozitivno pravo)

Changes in Circumstances: Frustrated Contracts and Legislative or Judicial Modification of the Contract

Gratuitous Contracts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About