2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EURADOS intercomparisons for individual monitoring services: Results of the 2015 extremity dosemeter intercomparison for photon and beta radiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the intercomparison during the CONRAD project, larger exercises were performed in the context of EURADOS periodic intercomparisons. They resulted in comparable results and highlighted the persisting challenge of accurately measuring extremity exposure from beta particles in NM [91,92]. Again, participants used almost exclusively dosimeters based on LiF detectors (n ⩾ 46/57 and n = 69/72 in [91] and [92], respectively).…”
Section: Dosimeter Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the intercomparison during the CONRAD project, larger exercises were performed in the context of EURADOS periodic intercomparisons. They resulted in comparable results and highlighted the persisting challenge of accurately measuring extremity exposure from beta particles in NM [91,92]. Again, participants used almost exclusively dosimeters based on LiF detectors (n ⩾ 46/57 and n = 69/72 in [91] and [92], respectively).…”
Section: Dosimeter Performancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although thermoluminescent detectors are the most frequently used (as illustrated by their predominance in the intercomparisons and the literature in general) other types of dosimeters are available as well for extremity monitoring. For instance, optically stimulated detectors are also used in routine, while the use of active dosimeters is usually limited to research or optimization purposes (3,5,26,29,44,92). However, no results were reported about the specific performance of such dosimeters in the intercomparison exercises owing to their low number.…”
Section: Dosimeter Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intercomparisons are funded on a cost recovery basis from participant fees, and the programme has been running since 2008 (Grimbergen et al 2016. Intercomparisons for whole-body photon/beta dosemeters (Figel et al 2016) are held in alternate years, with intercomparisons for extremity photon/beta (Stadtmann et al 2017) and for whole body neutron dosemeters (Chevallier et al, 2016)…”
Section: Wg 2 "Harmonisation Of Individual Monitoring"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisation of ICs for IMSs is done by specific task groups of WG02, the so-called IC Organising Groups (OGs). The EURADOS IC programme [18,19] has so far led to the organisation of IC exercises for whole body dosemeters in photon fields every two years [20][21][22][23], IC exercises for extremity dosemeters in photon and beta fields in 2009, 2015 and 2019 [19,25,26], and IC exercises for neutron dosemeters in 2012 and 2017 [19,27,28].…”
Section: Scientific Workhops At Ammentioning
confidence: 99%