1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1993.tb00241.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Integration and the Demand for Broad Money

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…studies on money demand on the European level as Monticelli and Papi (1996), Wesche (1997), Fagan and Henry (1998) and Fase and Winder (1998). Recently, Vlaar and Schuberth (1999), Monticelli and Tristani (1999) and Coenen and Vega (1999) have presented SVAR studies analysing the transmission of monetary policy for different sets of variables based on aggregated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…studies on money demand on the European level as Monticelli and Papi (1996), Wesche (1997), Fagan and Henry (1998) and Fase and Winder (1998). Recently, Vlaar and Schuberth (1999), Monticelli and Tristani (1999) and Coenen and Vega (1999) have presented SVAR studies analysing the transmission of monetary policy for different sets of variables based on aggregated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Although the specification bias of national estimations due to the omission of relevant euro area foreign variables is avoided by aggregated analysis (see e.g. Monticelli and Papi, 1996;Pesaran, Pierse and Kumar, 1989), a bias due to differences in parameters or even functional form between national specifications is likely. This is a further argument that national and aggregated analyses should be considered complementary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nous pouvons également citer les travaux de Kremers et Lane (1990), Artis, BladenHovell et Zhang (1992), Monticelly et Strauss-Kahn (1993), Artis (1996), Monteccelli (1996), tullio, de Souza et giuccia (1996, Wesche (1997) et Spencer (1997.…”
unclassified
“…Compared with our approach, this procedure has two limitations: First, it is not based on a well founded microeconomic theory of money demand; second, the CS hypothesis is assessed on the basis of a variable that is not observable, namely the expected exchange rate depreciation. The proxies used were the long-term interest rate differential in Bekx and Tullio [1989]; the dollar-ECU nominal exchange rate in Kremers and Lane [1990]; the actual exchange rate depreciation in Monticelli and Strauss-Kahn [1993]; and the dollar-ECU real exchange rate in Artis [1996]. Regardless the quality of the proxies used, it is remarkable that in all these studies the respective coefficient was found to be significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A different question is whether CS vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar remains as a potential source of instability. This question was subject to scrutiny in the first wave of estimates addressing EU-wide monetary aggregates [Bekx and Tullio, 1989;Kremers and Lane, 1990;Monticelli and Strauss-Kahn, 1993;Artis, 1996]. In this literature, CS is tested by the significance of a variable capturing the expected exchange rate depreciation in the money demand equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%