2016
DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198729914.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Intellectual Property Law (DRAFT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach, characteristic of continental European law, defines the content boundaries of exclusive rights and establishes specific cases when the free use of someone else's work is allowed [14]. [15] allows states to establish restrictions on exclusive rights, for example, in such cases as illustrations intended for teaching, quotations cited in criticism or review, for noncommercial research or private study, and others.…”
Section: Fig 1 Educational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach, characteristic of continental European law, defines the content boundaries of exclusive rights and establishes specific cases when the free use of someone else's work is allowed [14]. [15] allows states to establish restrictions on exclusive rights, for example, in such cases as illustrations intended for teaching, quotations cited in criticism or review, for noncommercial research or private study, and others.…”
Section: Fig 1 Educational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an international level, the minimum criteria for the grant of such licences are set out under the TRIPS Agreement, which makes the TRIPS Agreement 'binding upon the institutions of the Union and its Member States'. 40 Moreover, whilst the TRIPS Agreement does not have direct effect in EU member states by virtue of EU law, 41 nonetheless, when domestic courts are interpreting provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, they must do so 'as far as possible' 'in the light of the wording and the purpose' of the TRIPS provision, given the EU entered into the TRIPS Agreement on behalf of states. 42 Alongside the provisions within the TRIPS Agreement, all contracting parties of the TRIPS Agreement must also comply with the substantive provisions of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property 1883, as amended (hereafter the Paris Convention) of which Article 5 relates to licensing without the rights-holder's authorisation.…”
Section: Licensing Without Patent-holder's Authorisation: Ireland's International Obligationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu toate acestea, în jurisprudența națională și europeană, există un oarecare consens cu privire la parazitismul mărcilor atunci când între două mărci concurente există o prea mare apropiere. Cu alte cuvinte, nu este necesară o identitate perfectă din punct de vedere verbal (sau vizual) pentru ca să fie anulată o marcă parazitară în raport cu alta (Sabel v Puma, bunăoară 8 ).…”
Section: Jurisprudența îN Materie De Similitudini îN Cazul Mărcilor Vunclassified