European Regional Convergence Revisited: A Weighted Least Squares Approach

Abstract

A plethora of past studies have concluded that unconditional "&bgr;"-convergence is present in a broad sample of regions, implying that poor regions grow faster than rich ones. All these econometric studies tend to overlook the relative importance or size of each region in the national setting, treating all regional observations as equal. However, this assumption might lead to unrealistic or misleading results. Convergence analysis could be more meaningful if it included a weighting mechanism taking into account the size of regions. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the inclusion of a weighting mechanism in "&bgr;"-convergence analysis, giving more weight to larger regions and less to smaller ones, can result in sharply different implications for the regional convergence-divergence process. For this reason, both unweighted ordinary least squares (OLS) and weighted least squares estimators are used in the analysis of regional (intra-national) convergence within 10 European Union (EU) countries over the period 1990-2000. The comparison between the two methods reveals that when regions are appropriately weighted for their size, intra-national divergence, rather than convergence found with the OLS approach, seems to be the dominant experience in the EU. Copyright (c) 2009 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc..

Convergence patterns in the world economy: exploring the nonlinearity hypothesis

“…An additional major drawback of mainstream OLS econometric convergence analysis is that, by overlooking the relative population size of each economy and treating all observations as equal, it could lead to erroneous conclusions (Petrakos et al, 2005;Petrakos and Artelaris, 2009). This issue has been generally overlooked by the relevant literature [1], with some exceptions.…”

Regional Inequalities in the New European Union Member-States: Is There a ‘Population Size’ Effect?

“…The level and the evolution of regional inequalities is a topic of great importance for both theory and policy (Sala-i-Martin, 1996;Petrakos and Artelaris, 2009). From the policy viewpoint, the level of regional inequalities can be seen as an evaluation of the effectiveness of regional policy measures.…”

Some Perpetually Old and New Development Issues in the EU Regions: Competitiveness, Resilience, and Convergence: Where Do the New Member States Stand?

“…Only around half of the regions starting with below national average GDP per capita levels in 1991 experienced a catch-up over the period 1991 to 2009, and only two thirds of the regions starting with above national average GDP per capita in 1991 converged toward the respective country average until 2009 [103]. At the same time, across the EU the conditional convergence was less pronounced, signaling increasing disparities among the regions [46,95], especially in the EU-15 countries but also in the NMS, revealing the existence of selective tendencies, convergence clubs, and asymmetric shocks, which might lead to greater spatial inequalities (see [104,105]). Moreover, the European Commission's successive Periodic Reports show that real economic convergence is a long way off and in some countries regional economic disparities have even worsened [106][107][108][109].…”