2009
DOI: 10.1080/14719030902989516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Sport Governance, Citizens, And The State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Algumas teorias, tais como a Teoria dos Stakeholders (Freeman, 1984), a Teoria dos Recursos (Barney, 1991) (Holt, 2009), têm sido empregadas para explicar o fenômeno da governança nos esportes (Ferkins e Shilbury, 2012), que é um dos principais desafios deste século para as entidades esportivas (Groeneveld, 2009). O termo "sport governance" (Hoye e Cuskelly, 2003) surgiu pela primeira vez, na literatura acadêmica, no trabalho de Chalip (1995), como forma de melhorar a política, a formulação e implementação estratégica das organizações esportivas.…”
Section: Governança Corporativa Nos Esportesunclassified
“…Algumas teorias, tais como a Teoria dos Stakeholders (Freeman, 1984), a Teoria dos Recursos (Barney, 1991) (Holt, 2009), têm sido empregadas para explicar o fenômeno da governança nos esportes (Ferkins e Shilbury, 2012), que é um dos principais desafios deste século para as entidades esportivas (Groeneveld, 2009). O termo "sport governance" (Hoye e Cuskelly, 2003) surgiu pela primeira vez, na literatura acadêmica, no trabalho de Chalip (1995), como forma de melhorar a política, a formulação e implementação estratégica das organizações esportivas.…”
Section: Governança Corporativa Nos Esportesunclassified
“…For example, in her discussion of football development in Europe through the co-processes lens, Groeneveld (2009) explained that football organisations engaged in sport as a social development tool may be reluctant to engage with the co-governance approach as it means working alongside the bureaucratic machinery of the European Union. While outdoor organisations in NZ are a considerable organisational, geographical, political, and financial distance from the European Union, identifying whether and how co-governance exists in the outdoor activity sector will enable us to identify opportunities for co-governance relationships between the state, in this case represented by Sport NZ, and the organisations involved.…”
Section: Co-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the mechanics of neo-liberalism limit the amount of true governance negotiation that non-profit organisations can have with government and the provision of governmentdriven programmes is a more realistic role (Groeneveld, 2009). Bransden and van Hout (2006) argue that once the façade of co-governance is lifted and co-management is examined, we are able to get a much better picture of how organisations work alongside each other in 9 the delivery of social services.…”
Section: Co-managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brandsen and Pestoff 2006, Pestoff 2006, Groeneveld 2009). According to Brandsen and Pestoff (2006), coproduction, co-management and co-governance are three core types of relationships which can be considered as a typology for overlaps in service delivery between the third sector, citizens and the state.…”
Section: Literature Review: Iors and Conflicting Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, concepts such as co-production and co-management relate to a type of inter-organisational interaction which is not about regulation in the sense of control, but instead is very much about cooperative sustainability. However, non-profit sport organisations are still being made subject to increased public scrutiny (Groeneveld 2009) and coercive pressure (Vos et al 2011).…”
Section: Literature Review: Iors and Conflicting Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%