2021
DOI: 10.1177/23969873211024143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) standard operating procedure for the preparation and publishing of guidelines

Abstract: The first European Stroke Organization (ESO) standard operating procedure (SOP) published in 2015 aimed at the implementation the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to provide evidence-based guidelines for stroke management. This second ESO-SOP is aiming at further increase of the practicability of ESO guidelines and its technical implications. Authors comprised of the members of the ESO guideline Board and ESO Executive Committee. The final document was agre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This document was developed following the ESO standard operating procedure for guideline development 53 and the GRADE methodology. This guideline aims to inform physicians about evidence available on managing suspected stroke patients with a MSU in the prehospital setting and it aims to assist decision-makers in understanding the benefits of a prehospital advanced management of patients with suspected stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This document was developed following the ESO standard operating procedure for guideline development 53 and the GRADE methodology. This guideline aims to inform physicians about evidence available on managing suspected stroke patients with a MSU in the prehospital setting and it aims to assist decision-makers in understanding the benefits of a prehospital advanced management of patients with suspected stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each PICO question and each outcome, the risk of bias was assessed and quality of evidence rated as high, moderate, low or very low based on the type of available evidence [randomised or non-randomised studies (interventional with experimental design and non-interventional)] and considerations on inconsistency of results, indirectness of evidence, imprecision of results and risk of bias. 53,54 GRADE evidence profiles/summary of findings tables were generated using GRADEpro.8. Each PICO question was addressed separately in distinct sections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, an 'Additional information' paragraph could be added to provide more details on randomized trials mentioned in the first paragraph, to summarize results of observational studies, or to provide information on ongoing or future trials. Third, according to the revised ESO standard operating procedure, 14 an 'Expert consensus statement' paragraph was added whenever the PICO group deemed that the available evidence was insufficient to provide evidence-based recommendations for situations in which practical guidance is needed for routine clinical practice. In that particular case, a pragmatic suggestion was provided.…”
Section: Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%