1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38384-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European Tracked Micro-Robot for Planetary Surface Exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are not considering here aerial robot explorers for planetary exploration [38], which by definition are not vacuum devices. For the same reason robots with manipulators for exploring planets are beyond the scope of this paper [39][40][41][42]. Therefore, in this case, we can only talk about the applications in "open space" and non-atmospheric bodies: meteorites and others [43].…”
Section: Fig 2 Example Of the Broken Polymer Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not considering here aerial robot explorers for planetary exploration [38], which by definition are not vacuum devices. For the same reason robots with manipulators for exploring planets are beyond the scope of this paper [39][40][41][42]. Therefore, in this case, we can only talk about the applications in "open space" and non-atmospheric bodies: meteorites and others [43].…”
Section: Fig 2 Example Of the Broken Polymer Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mass margin can be used in numerous ways; extra science instruments, deep drilling tools, technology demonstrations (enough mass for backups using conventional equipment), or lunar rovers could be employed. Unmanned or manned rovers of a range of sizes [20] allow for a large area of exploration, up to ranges of tens of kilometers. For example, a Boeing design for a manned light utility rover has a mass of 984 kg [21], meaning this system could also transport small amounts of cargo for manned support missions.…”
Section: Diminishing Returns -Near Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relies on track slippage so vehicle odometry on such vehicles is lost, though this is not a major disadvantage as wheel odometry is very inaccurate and must be augmented with external sensing modalities. This is the traction system adopted on the European Space Agency's Nanokhod micro-rover [6], see Fig. 2(b).…”
Section: Tracked Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%