2022
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2021.2017339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euroregions as political actors: managing border policies in the time of Covid-19 in Polish borderlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results illustrate that border regions were dependent on national decisions, on which border actors had little impact. This confirms the findings of Opioła and Böhm (2022), who note a limited influence of Euroregions on national decisions. Both support the conclusion that communication channels between the cross-border and national levels need to be strengthened.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our results illustrate that border regions were dependent on national decisions, on which border actors had little impact. This confirms the findings of Opioła and Böhm (2022), who note a limited influence of Euroregions on national decisions. Both support the conclusion that communication channels between the cross-border and national levels need to be strengthened.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is a significant handicap for border regions, as they tend to rely on cross-border connections (Kajta & Opiłowska, 2021;Novotný, 2021). Opioła and Böhm (2022) studied the impact of Euroregions along Polish national borders during the COVID-19 pandemic and found diverse border-regional patterns. They concluded that Euroregions only had a marginal impact on national decision making, even though effective cross-border cooperation in crises and cross-border resilience require national decisions and national interest in border issues (cf.…”
Section: Border-regional Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative, as well as quantitative approaches, can be seen. Descriptive analysis (e.g., document or social media analysis), as well as (semi‐structured) interviews, are the prevailing forms of qualitative research in the selected articles (e.g., Baez Moreno, 2020; Böhm, 2022; de Vries, 2020; Leiblfinger et al, 2021; Martin & Bergmann, 2021; Medeiros et al, 2021; Novotný, 2021; Opioła & Böhm, 2022; Virkkunen, 2020; Wu, 2021; Zhou et al, 2021). In addition to this, multiple forms of statistical modeling can be found (e.g., Hamidi et al, 2020; Laroze et al, 2021; Wilmes et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetry in the socioeconomic development of border regions is an opportunity for mutual compensation of regional shortages at cultural, tourism and economic levels as well the labour market, services, etc. The existing development disparities can be a difficult barrier to overcome, limiting cross-border ties, particularly in institutional cooperation (Masik & Sagan, 2016;Opioła & Böhm, 2022), which creates the basis for integration. Important factors limiting the reduction of asymmetry include relations between neighbouring states, position in the international environment, institutional environment and associated conditions (related to the presence of an institutional and organisational gap), socio-demographic conditions (related to multiculturality and unfavourable demographic processes), as well as economic conditions resulting from existing differences in economic systems and levels of development of borderlands (Komornicki et al, 2019).…”
Section: An Analysis Of the Turów Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%