2018
DOI: 10.1057/s41304-018-0162-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euroscepticism and the electoral success of the far right: the role of the strategic interaction between center and far right

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in stable democracies, the breakthrough of radical right parties has contributed to an increased polarisation at the party level, because they legitimise extreme ideological positions, while moving opposing parties and voters to the ideological extremes (Bischof & Wagner 2019;Castanho Silva 2018;Mudde 2013). Critical contexts certainly helped the breakthrough of the radical right parties: the anti-incumbency vote has usually punished the mainstream parties that ruled the country during the recession years (Downes & Loveless 2018), and the anti-immigration vote has fuelled support for far-right parties that, in times of economic crisis, have taken hard stances against immigrants and other scapegoats like the European Union (Pardos-Prado 2015;Szöcsik & Polyakova 2019). In an effort to face these challenges, mainstream conservative parties may strategically emphasise those issues that have a chance of mitigating electoral losses (Downes & Loveless 2018) by changing their platforms as a reaction against the new radical competitors (Mudde 2013;Rooduijn, De Lange & van der Brug 2014).…”
Section: Polarisation and Party Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in stable democracies, the breakthrough of radical right parties has contributed to an increased polarisation at the party level, because they legitimise extreme ideological positions, while moving opposing parties and voters to the ideological extremes (Bischof & Wagner 2019;Castanho Silva 2018;Mudde 2013). Critical contexts certainly helped the breakthrough of the radical right parties: the anti-incumbency vote has usually punished the mainstream parties that ruled the country during the recession years (Downes & Loveless 2018), and the anti-immigration vote has fuelled support for far-right parties that, in times of economic crisis, have taken hard stances against immigrants and other scapegoats like the European Union (Pardos-Prado 2015;Szöcsik & Polyakova 2019). In an effort to face these challenges, mainstream conservative parties may strategically emphasise those issues that have a chance of mitigating electoral losses (Downes & Loveless 2018) by changing their platforms as a reaction against the new radical competitors (Mudde 2013;Rooduijn, De Lange & van der Brug 2014).…”
Section: Polarisation and Party Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPP have become the most successful new party family in Europe over the last quarter of a century (Painter, 2013: 9). The conceptual core of right-wing populism includes not only antielitism and nativism, but Euroscepticism (Pirro et al, 2018;Vasilopoulou, 2018;Szöcsik and Polyakova, 2018) and anti-pluralism (Taggart, 2012), which threaten the results of the European integration project and the institutions of EU multilevel political construction.…”
Section: Populism: a Threat To Or Resource For Resilience?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Sanitary cordon", as well as the strategy of ignoring, demands a high level of coordinated actions between mainstream parties. A fail in the "sanitary cordon" strategy may result in, as Cappocia argued, mainstream parties being temptation to defect from the center, in order to regain the votes that they are losing to extremists (2001: 438), especially center-right parties (Szöcsik and Polyakova, 2018).…”
Section: Strategy Of Isolation Implies Political And/or Legal Restricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if the process of "dedemonisation" or 'demarcation" of RPP with traditional radical right parties and movements (Rothwell, 2017), and presenting themselves as respectable political forces was successful, the effectiveness of isolating and demonising the RPP by the political mainstream, can bring the opposite effect in increasing the public support of RPP (Art, 2007: 335; van Spanje, 2017: 10-11). (Downs, 2001:27) On the other hand, the cooptation strategy legitimises the far-right agenda, especially for nativist anti-migrant and anti-EU positions (Szöcsik and Polyakova, 2018) and erodes the boundaries between RPP and the political mainstream. The strategy of the cooptation, creates conditions for two counter and intersecting processes: "mainstreamisastion" the RPP and the "populist contamination" (Rydgren, 2005) of the political mainstream's discourse.…”
Section: Strategy Of Isolation Implies Political And/or Legal Restricmentioning
confidence: 99%