2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS is still superior to multidetector computerized tomography for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
90
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study the sensitivity of EUS for detection of pNETs was 95%.our results are similar to the study of Khashab and et al in Johns Hopkins that CT was unable for detection of lesions less than 2 cm that probability of insulinoma is more than other lesions, so EUS is a primary sensitive test for detection of insulinoma (Khashab et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study the sensitivity of EUS for detection of pNETs was 95%.our results are similar to the study of Khashab and et al in Johns Hopkins that CT was unable for detection of lesions less than 2 cm that probability of insulinoma is more than other lesions, so EUS is a primary sensitive test for detection of insulinoma (Khashab et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, computed tomography technology, the imaging modality that is most commonly used to investigate known or suspected pancreatic tumours, has improved. As a result, it has become increasingly common to identify pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, with a detection rate exceeding 80% [10]. Finally, although overall survival for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is more favourable than for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas, the median overall survival in metastatic disease does not exceed 2-5.8 years [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, computed tomography (CT) identified the majority of pancreatic NETs (84% [n=231]) (Khashab, Yong et al 2011). This sensitivity was greater in nonfunctional pancreatic NETs (92% [n=173]).…”
Section: Methods For Identifying the Primary Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before surgery, a CT scan, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and upper/lower endoscopy should be done (Wang, Parekh et al 2010). EUS may be of value in identifying the location of an insulinoma (Khashab, Yong et al 2011). …”
Section: Methods For Identifying the Primary Sitementioning
confidence: 99%