2019
DOI: 10.36740/wlek201904133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euthanasia or Palliative Care: Legal Principles of the Implementation in the Context of the Realization of Human Rights to Life

Abstract: Introduction: The right to life – is natural inherent human right, the fundamental principle of the existence of mankind, recognized by all civilized countries. It is enshrined in numerous international and national legal acts as the most important benefit of a man. However, there are discussions about the use of euthanasia. Therefore, the problem of the legalization of euthanasia requires careful study. The aim: The purpose of this article is to analyze and systematize existing problems of the legalization of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, more and more recently euthanasia opponents have been saying that there is a need for an adequate care for the terminally ill. Palliative care with its "right" ideology, which aims to achieve the best quality of life for patients and their families, is an alternative to euthanasia. Therefore, it is necessary to develop, approve and fund State programs for the development of palliative care and hospice care, to establish a National Coordination Council for palliative care and hospice care, to create a legal framework for the legal regulation of palliative care, to establish a system of state control over the quality of palliative care and palliative care patients in the palliative care process through accreditation and licensing of palliative care facilities [25]. Note that it is necessary to distinguish between palliative sedation and terminal sedation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, more and more recently euthanasia opponents have been saying that there is a need for an adequate care for the terminally ill. Palliative care with its "right" ideology, which aims to achieve the best quality of life for patients and their families, is an alternative to euthanasia. Therefore, it is necessary to develop, approve and fund State programs for the development of palliative care and hospice care, to establish a National Coordination Council for palliative care and hospice care, to create a legal framework for the legal regulation of palliative care, to establish a system of state control over the quality of palliative care and palliative care patients in the palliative care process through accreditation and licensing of palliative care facilities [25]. Note that it is necessary to distinguish between palliative sedation and terminal sedation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%