2012
DOI: 10.1117/12.916291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUV mask line edge roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From our data we can say that we achieved better than 0.9 nm rms (2.7 nm 3σ) LER in the HM8006 layer for the wide structures and better than 0.65 nm rms (1.95 nm 3σ) LER for the thinnest, one pixel wide lines which are used to write the nested L-structures with a half pitch of 27.5 nm. These numbers are comparable to LER figures obtained for standard nonchemically amplified resists in high-resolution e-beam lithography and compatible with mask requirements for EUV lithography …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…From our data we can say that we achieved better than 0.9 nm rms (2.7 nm 3σ) LER in the HM8006 layer for the wide structures and better than 0.65 nm rms (1.95 nm 3σ) LER for the thinnest, one pixel wide lines which are used to write the nested L-structures with a half pitch of 27.5 nm. These numbers are comparable to LER figures obtained for standard nonchemically amplified resists in high-resolution e-beam lithography and compatible with mask requirements for EUV lithography …”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…(Figure 1, center). Early studies simulations [ between LER printing [5,6] tern transfer in ughness are amo fferent critical dim he reflective na the order of 2-Å ultilayer coatin ases, decreasin ial images of a t mination, the spec off-axis imaging s of aerial imag [2], predicting R on independe ]: they found th EUV lithograp ong the paramete mensions; they'r ature of EUV p Å-RMS [1]. D g, causing pha ng the illuminat typical EUV ph ckle caused by m g conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18] In 2003, Constantoudis et al proposed a new LER characterization methodology in which the LER is quantified together by three parameters: standard deviation, correlation length and roughness exponent. However, a single number LER method is not good anymore when people continue to reduce LER and decompose it in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%